![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() why make it easier?
rupert, i know you have your opinion. why you inject what percentage of trainers you think would agree with you in there, i don't know. nor do i know that your '90% of' is accurate. yes, it's tough, it should be. else, it's nothing special. everyone knows the schedule, they space accordingly. it's not like someone will win the derby and then say what do you mean the preakness is in two weeks. three horses won it since 69, a lot more have come really close. just found this, take note of the close calls before 1969, and how many are after the latest schedule change: Failed Triple Crown attempts[edit] The following horses won the Kentucky Derby and the Preakness but were beaten in the Belmont: Pensive (1944): second to Bounding Home Tim Tam (1958): second to Cavan Carry Back (1961): seventh to Sherluck Northern Dancer (1964): third to Quadrangle Kauai King (1966): fourth to Amberoid Forward Pass (1968): second to Stage Door Johnny Majestic Prince (1969): second to Arts and Letters Canonero II (1971): fourth to Pass Catcher Spectacular Bid (1979): third to Coastal Pleasant Colony (1981): third to Summing Alysheba (1987): fourth to Bet Twice Sunday Silence (1989): second to Easy Goer Silver Charm (1997): second to Touch Gold Real Quiet (1998): second to Victory Gallop Charismatic (1999): third to Lemon Drop Kid War Emblem (2002): eighth to Sarava Funny Cide (2003): third to Empire Maker Smarty Jones (2004): second to Birdstone Big Brown (2008): Did Not Finish to Da' Tara looks like they already did make it easier, judging by how many have come close since '69.
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all. Abraham Lincoln |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|