![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Exactly.. Saratoga isn't much better, so much red tape for anything as well. It's a joke. I just always assume when my horses are running that I will get screwed by calling for anything so why bother. Like I said, it's a joke.
Takes a miracle for anything to happen. even getting down the stairs into the paddock is a at aqueduct is a pain in the ass with my 3 little kids, somebody always giving you a hard time over something. MAKES YOU JUST FEEL THE LOVE. Last edited by Big Peps : 04-29-2014 at 08:17 AM. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Porter sounds like a rich, entitled, whiner to me
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I have run horses that I have owned in partnerships at Saratoga, haven't been fortunate enough to run horses I own by myself there yet. I have a two year old that should run there this summer if all works out. I will run there yes and will certainly will just show up with my family and enjoy it. I ran at Fairground this past year but I prefer to sit in the stands anyway, there I usually just hang out in the Star Guitar bar between races and enjoy the view of the paddock if it's just my wife and myself. It's nice if you have a larger group to have access to some private seating or at least a bit easier than they make it I enjoy the sport regardless obviously but I do think it's a pain in the arse at the bigger tracks. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() I have a solution. They should just raise the takeout on the ordinary horseplayers so the millionaires and buddies can get free box seats.
![]()
__________________
Do I think Charity can win? Well, I am walking around in yesterday's suit. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Obviously there is a balance that needs to be found but if you piss off owners in an industry that needs improvement , it's not a great business plan. Plain and simple. Doesn't take a genius to figure out that most horse owners ain't making money, perks matter to many.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() CD always used to provide owners with horses in under card stakes on Oaks and Derby days with accommodations that weren't in the nosebleed section for a face value cost (which of course was far cheaper than what they charge now)
They used to have a vice president of racing that handled things like this. Why would a racing company need an executive in charge of racing matters after all? |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|