![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Call me crazy but i didn't see any blatant bias. Yesterdays track couldn't compare to Belmonts extreme bias it displayed during that stretch during BC preview weekend.
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
I suppose the latest tinfoil conspiracy is that Frank Stronach owns Fort Larned future stud rights and he owns the sire of Game On Dude... not to mention quite a number of Awesome Again mares.
So, naturally, Frank would want his track playing in a way to produce a record time win by Fort Larned or Game On Dude. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
On this surface perhaps Pletcher should put the blinkers back on Palace Malice and let him run his derby race again.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
"Success does not consist in never making blunders, but in never making the same one a second time." - Josh Billings |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
so most of you on here are saying that the track was fair..
ive got no problem with it bieng that way as i ajusted my plays after looking at thursdays .. but it was far from a fair track.not to mention trainers do tend to load up horses for the big day..its just a fact |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
When you have a $77 and $96 dollar winner go back to back on the front through silly fractions, you really have to have your head in the sand to think it's fair.
__________________
Do I think Charity can win? Well, I am walking around in yesterday's suit. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
7 dirt races. 2 wire jobs..1 winner laying second. 2 winners laying 3-4th 2 lengths off the lead. 2 closers..Seems it's reasonable the track was at least somewhat fair.
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
And when Frankel finally won the Breeder's Cup Classic, it was with a Stronach horse, at a Stronach controlled racetrack.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|