By the way, the definition of mariage for the longest time has been "The state of being united to a person of the opposite sex in a consensual and contractual relationship recognized by law."
That is what the definition is. Maybe we should change it to accomodate all kinds of other relationships. I don't know. I don't think we should but that is just my opinion. If we do change it, should there only be one change? Should it just be changed to include same-sex one-on-one relationships? Or are there even other alternative lifestyles that could be included? I think that is a legitimate question. If you're going to change the definition of something, how far do you go?
|
11-23-2006, 03:58 PM
Threaded Mode