NYRA Fanchise Recommendation

[randallscott35]

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind

Eric, it is a RECOMMENDATION and is binding in absolutely no way.

In other words, it's meaningless.

Excactly, in fact the same game will be played again next year. Speaking to Nader he is realistic about this recommendation, i.e. they won't get it. But it doesn't matter. I think they have an excellent chance in the long run to keep it....He also said that relations with Spitzer were improving quite a bit.

[blackthroatedwind]

Originally Posted by randallscott35

Excactly, in fact the same game will be played again next year. Speaking to Nader he is realistic about this recommendation, i.e. they won't get it. But it doesn't matter. I think they have an excellent chance in the long run to keep it....He also said that relations with Spitzer were improving quite a bit.

I think the game will be played quite differently next year.

They can't get the recomendation. Basically claiming land ownership disqualifies them.

[ELA]

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind

I think the game will be played quite differently next year.

They can't get the recomendation. Basically claiming land ownership disqualifies them.

Andy, who is "They" and "them" -- ??? Thanks.

Eric

[blackthroatedwind]

Originally Posted by ELA

Andy, who is "They" and "them" -- ??? Thanks.

Eric

They is NYRA.

[ELA]

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind

They is NYRA.

Thanks for the clarification. So, maybe I am missing something or drawing a real mental blank here, but why does claiming land ownership -- which I believe NYRA is still standing by there original claim -- disqualify them from being the one who the committee recommends? Thanks again.

Eric