Hillary: "I take responsibility"

[SOREHOOF]

Originally Posted by Riot

The fact is, the next day after the attack, the president attributed this to terrorists, but wanted to wait for the FBI. On Letterman, he didn't attribute it to the video, he attributed the attack to terrorists.

Which YouTube video (of the many posted about this) are you talking about, the original one about the Muslims?

What big lie?

And now there is all this RWNJ craziness about "Hillary taking a fall" - do you people HAVE ANY EFFING GRASP ON REALITY AT ALL? COME AWAY FROM THE WND WEBSITE!

Never mind ... I forget I'm talking to Birthers.

YouTube vid? Ummmm? The one the Hill and the Prezzee blamed for the bumps?

[SOREHOOF]

Letterman?

[Riot]

Originally Posted by SOREHOOF

YouTube vid? Ummmm? The one the Hill and the Prezzee blamed for the bumps?

Sorry - I don't share the RWNJ fantasy-land view.

I watched the real press conferences, Letterman, etc. of what the Pres actually said Not the lies spread by the RW loonies.

Not as much fun, but it explains why "Libya-Gate" is only a story-conspiracy in the Conservative Oz Fantasy Land. Of course, the RWNJ explaination for that is, of course: "Librul media sux and is covering up, they love Obama, and it's a big conspiracy to hide it."

Ah ... I'm just gonna enjoy these last few weeks, vote November 6. and enjoy 4 more years of non-neocon, non-evangelical, non-warmongering, non-crazy government.

Because all the tax cuts are gonna expire January 1 as we go off the cliff, the GOP will be then be held hostage to exactly what the Dems want to change, and Obama is gonna own the next four years of subsequent economic growth and prosperity.

[SOREHOOF]

It's not fantasy Riot! They actually said it. Shamelessly blamed a youtube vid that nobody was aware of for a commando assault on our Embassy. And they knew it the whole time but lied anyway.

[Riot]

Originally Posted by SOREHOOF

It's not fantasy Riot! They actually said it. Shamelessly blamed a youtube vid that nobody was aware of for a commando assault on our Embassy. And they knew it the whole time but lied anyway.

Sigh ... have you simply not read the thread? It's effing fantasy. Yes, I know what Susan Rice said (I watched it as it happened), but you cannot deny that president didn't come out the next day (the week before Rice) and say it was terrorists, or that he said it was terrorists on Letterman. Or on The View.

Hello! These things exist, and there is video to prove it.

I posted the video. Watch it. The president's press statement the day after it happened is out there, too. Continuing to ignore those things actually exist is simply beyond crazy. Yes. It's fantasy. And it's a fantasy that only exists out there in Obama-Derangement land, populated by birthers, "He's a commie Muslim", and other wing nuts.

[Rupert Pupkin]

Originally Posted by Riot

Sigh ... have you simply not read the thread? It's effing fantasy. Yes, I know what Susan Rice said (I watched it as it happened), but you cannot deny that president didn't come out the next day (the week before Rice) and say it was terrorists, or that he said it was terrorists on Letterman. Or on The View.

Hello! These things exist, and there is video to prove it.

I posted the video. Watch it. The president's press statement the day after it happened is out there, too. Continuing to ignore those things actually exist is simply beyond crazy. Yes. It's fantasy. And it's a fantasy that only exists out there in Obama-Derangement land, populated by birthers, "He's a commie Muslim", and other wing nuts.

What are you smoking? I'm going to make a statement and you tell me if my statement is truthful. Here is my statement: "There was a protest over a video and the protest got out of hand and the protesters end up killing our ambassador. We will not tolerate an 'act of terror' like this."

Is that a true statement? Is that an accurate portrayal of what happened in Libya? The fact that I used the word "terror" in there is meaningless. I still mischaracterized the whole incident and that is exactly what Obama did. He made statements almost identical to my statement.

You can try to play with semantics and say that Obama did use the word "terror" in the Rose Garden. He did use the word "terrorist" on Letterman. Who cares? He still totally lied about what happened. By the time he came on Letterman, he knew exactly what happened yet he was still talking about the video. When Letterman asked him about what happened in Libya, Obama said, "Here is what happened. There was a video released......"

[dellinger63]

Who takes responsiblity for Hillary?

[Riot]

Originally Posted by dellinger63

Who takes responsiblity for Hillary?

Damn ... seems some of you guys - including Romney - really need to access some reliable information sources (outside of the odd interpretations and reality-ignoring RWNJ echo chamber), before you go all in on ... falsehoods, like you have on the Libyan consulate attack.

How Mitt Romney’s Latest Attack On Libya Is Falling Apart

By Judd Legum on Oct 20, 2012 at 12:45 pm

http://thinkprogress.org/security/20...falling-apart/

Fox Admits Libya Attack May Have Been Caused By Anti-Muslim Video

By Hayes Brown on Oct 20, 2012 at 9:59 am

The right-wing is beginning to reverse itself on insisting that a anti-Muslim YouTube video had nothing to do with the attack on a U.S. diplomatic mission in Libya. Republicans and Fox News have scorned the Obama administration for weeks for initial statements that the assault in Benghazi, that took the life of Ambassador Chris Stevens, was an outgrowth of a protest sparked by this video.

Fox’s Geraldo Rivera went against that narrative on Friday. After Fox and Friends host Steve Doocy once again mocked the notion that the video was an impetus for the attack, Rivera instead presented the idea that it was in fact both a reaction to the video and a terrorist attack.

The hosts quickly attempted to pull Rivera back on-message after he completed explaining his theory, but couldn’t persuade him to drop it completely.

http://thinkprogress.org/security/20...used-by-video/