Santa Anita selected as host for 2013 Breeders Cup

At least its on regular dirt

Originally Posted by helicopter11

At least its on regular dirt

that's the bright side

[pba1817]

Where do you guys propose they have the BC at other than CD or SA?

Originally Posted by pba1817

Where do you guys propose they have the BC at other than CD or SA?

monmouth, saratoga, keeneland (if they go back to dirt) to name a few

[santana]

Belmont...

Originally Posted by santana

Belmont...

oh yeah forgot belmont which should've gotten 2013 year and then monmouth 2014. 2015 up for grabs like saratoga or del mar (if they go back to dirt)

[skippy3481]

The breeders cup is never going to be at Saratoga.

[Merlinsky]

Originally Posted by handicapperernie

monmouth, saratoga, keeneland (if they go back to dirt) to name a few

Monmouth was told to reapply for 2014. Dunno the particulars as to why they couldn't do it in 2013. They've had to make the adjustments to host it before. Surely it isn't something that takes two years to get together when Santa Anita can go back to dirt from synthetic sooner than that. What could they possibly have to build or provide that would take that long? Sounds like the decision was already made.

If I didn't know any better, I'd think they're trying to gradually wean us off of different sites til it's almost entirely at Santa Anita, say 2/3 to 3/4 of the time, with maybe an occasional off year as a bone thrown to someone else, generally Churchill. Didn't Satish want us at one track? Wasn't it there partially because of things like the weather? I had a feeling something like this was gonna happen when Monmouth got turned down. If the horsemen want more rotation, I hope this isn't anybody playing games as a backdoor to a primary/permanent host track. This isn't saying SA is anything other than a great host, but it's rather frustrating to see them get it yet again, not long after the discussion about a permanent vs. rotating track system.

[my miss storm cat]

Originally Posted by Merlinsky

This isn't saying SA is anything other than a great host, but it's rather frustrating to see them get it yet again, not long after the discussion about a permanent vs. rotating track system.

Once again I'm lucky cause I live here but once again I'm pretty disgusted at the joke this has become.

I was hoping for Belmont and yeah I know that wasn't really gonna happen for 2013 (can't blame me for wishing though!) but Woodbine, Arlington, Gulfstream, etc..... this is so unfair.

This is un


be


liev


a


ble.

[dellinger63]

sorry all

[dellinger63]

Arlington's weather is so iffy, even though it's close and convenient for me personally I say know, especially until the Governor either becomes race friendly, is voted out or dies (in no particular order).

NY deserves one soon. But the Spa is far far too small. (don't think the BC crowd is the lay in the park on dirt kind of crowd)

And Monmouth was too small coupled with the lack of parking and neighborhood surroundings (no hotels) to host again IMO.

GP would be interesting but the grandstand is small. They do have a bunch of space to host VIP parties for people happy to watch the TV's and only get a glimpse of the actual track.

Though far from Chicago Santa Anita is my pick.

[onebadbeast]

keenland? place is smaller than a fishbowl....