![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
These fields look a lot like the west coast!
Just another "problem"we face in this "Sport Of Kings" ![]() ![]() |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Its a great card and its silly to complain. Ill take quality all day. I see money to be made, even with the small fields. Zo Impressive at 5-1, Cash for Clunkers at 12-1 and THAS and Shack being in the 5-2 up to 5-1 range because of the overbet Calebs Posse.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I mention all of this about Saginaw because he is likely to be no better than the FIFTH choice in the wagering of the Met Mile. That's because the top four horses are so talented and accomplished. I think that's a fairly clear sign that its a pretty damn good race. Not to mention the fact that the horse likely to be the longest shot in the field is a Pletcher/Castellano coming off a 3-length win in a G2. This sport has quite a few "problems." The field for this year's Met Mile certainly isn't one of them. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
In all time form, trying the big boys for the first time, seemingly overmatched. We'll see |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'm a little late, but just watched the replay of the Met Mile. I don't ever recall To Honor and Serve struggling to switch leads before. He looked like sh*t.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|