![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() when in doubt Churchill will overbet Borel. Gemologist will take money from those fascinated with the undefeated
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() And those two are as likely as any other individuals. Borel was definately overbet last year, but Street Sense was fair, MTB underbet I guess, and Super Saver was about fair IMO.
__________________
Do I think Charity can win? Well, I am walking around in yesterday's suit. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() I'm remaining neutral until the dapple reports start appearing.
__________________
Still trying to outsmart me, aren't you, mule-skinner? You want me to think that you don't want me to go down there, but the subtle truth is you really don't want me to go down there! |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() MTB was severely overbet, even at 50-1. I think the consensus is that fair value for him as far as accurately predicting his chances to win was at least 150-1. But both the Borel factor and the Giacomo factor knocked his price down. Street Sense was probably about fair value but of course Borel had never won a derby at that point so his effect on the odds was much less than it is now, espescially among the casual fans who show up once a year just to bet the derby.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
--Dunbar
__________________
Curlin and Hard Spun finish 1,2 in the 2007 BC Classic, demonstrating how competing in all three Triple Crown races ruins a horse for the rest of the year...see avatar photo from REUTERS/Lucas Jackson |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() What was Mine That Bird in the exotics though? I've always felt the win odds don't represent the true wagering in the Kentucky Derby. Even though there is a lot of volume, more once-a-year racegoers bet into the win pool vs. the others.
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|