|
|
 |
|
|
|
#1
11-03-2006, 06:14 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
oh, good point! hell, lots of heterosexuals are very much against marriage!! 
|
|
#2
11-03-2006, 06:22 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#3
11-03-2006, 06:34 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I really have nothing against gay people. They deserve the same rights as everyone. The problem that I have with all of this is that if it hypocrites are found by their own admissions, then they deserve their own consequences. I'll pray for Haggert's wife and five kids. I'll also include my position on this entire mess, "Judge not lest ye be judged." Obviously, Rupert didn't read Esther 7:9, 10. The very gallows that he prepared for Mordechai were the ones that he was hanged from. The irony, whether it was Foley's protecting children from internet porn, or Haggert's position with the 30 million evangelicals he lead in his crusade against gay marriage, or Gdubb's attempt to impose "democracy" on people that he invaded..wasted countless lives, many maimed, and an occupation that is doomed despite all claims of "victory", staying the course, "flexibility"... on and on... These times are crazy. Those "straw men" that became compost are only that. Some continue to believe in them. For sure, they're entitled to that. Just do me a favor. Spare me the gallows that I didn't construct for others to be hanged from. DTS
|
|
#4
11-03-2006, 06:38 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
and yeah, live by the sword, die by the sword--fits here... as for the war in iraq, i don't see the comparison--and if memory serves, congress backed up the original decision. of course a lot of people want us to forget that they voted in favor of that decision, now that things are looking bleak.
|
|
#5
11-03-2006, 06:46 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I agree with most of what you said. I don't agree that congress made an "informed decision". They were fed deceptive information about wmd's by a CIA and other "intelligence" agencies to substantiate a decision that had already been made. Note Powell's presentation to the uN and Bush's "State of the Union Address". Lies bite back. As it is written, "All things will be revealed".
|
|
#6
11-03-2006, 07:13 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
and it was funny to me that the same intelligence agencies that were being blamed for the lack of wmd's were suddenly being praised a few weeks back by those same critics when they came out with info that put the war and it's affects in a bad light. i guess NOW the CIA and others are correct, but were wrong before....
|
|
#7
11-03-2006, 07:21 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I'll have to do a search for the NIE report. It's worth the read. If authorization for going to war was based on false information, the blame is not on the ones that voted, but on those that provided the "information" on which it was based.
|
|
#8
11-03-2006, 07:30 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
huffington:although it goes without saying that we can be legitimately outraged at the administration that took us to war--that i blame the president goes without saying--i'm equally ourtaged at the democratic leadership for allowing the president to take us to war... playboy:...was there any reason for you to think the opposition would oppose, at least at the time? huffington: yes, because it was a matter of going to war. and remember, we were actually in the majority in the senate in 2002, if only for a moment. you can forgive politicians for going along on umimortant issues, but to allown an adminstration to take us into an unnecessary war? nothing is more immoral. playboy: but who in congress knew it was unnecessary? ti took years for accustaion that the administration manipulated and ignored intelligence to surface. continued...
|
|
#9
11-03-2006, 07:30 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
