![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Do you understand the political environment NYRA is, and has been, operating under? I am NOT saying they have been run perfectly, far from it, but I really think you have NO idea of the situation. By the way, in these situations, $30 million is nothing...and if the State hadn't been screwing NYRA over as regards to the slots, which EVERY OTHER TRACK AWARDED THEM IN NY STATE has been granted State approval ( and some years ago ), then this money would hardly be necessary. I will be happy to enlighten you at Churchill. I am tired of writing the same old obvious stuff. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I hope they don't sell. And if they do please don't sell to the group that includes MAGNA and Churchill.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I will say this...I also think that the state is wrong by putting a 4% interest on the money loaned. No way should that be the case. If they are going to give them the money then it shouldnt be paid back with interest.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Another thing I dont understand is why the NYRA is paying property tax. Most companies are exempt from property tax. I know Eli Lilly in Indy doesnt pay property tax but they have to employ a certain amount of people that live in a low income district. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
BTW -all the money that NYRA earns but is not allowed to keep any of goes directly to the state's coffers. Billions of dollars. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]() NYRA is a joke. I laugh how the state offers them money, but they insist they must get it all right now, instead of over 3 months. I guess the guys at NYRA must have had a tough weekend betting the NFL and their bookmakers are asking to collect right now. Oh, I forgot they are the mobsters. Maybe they got hit hard by the gamblers this weekend are tapped out.
Brilliant business plan on that NYRA. They claim their numbers are up again, but once again they don't have the money to stay afloat. Shocking! |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I think this situation has many complexities and nuances that most of us are completely unaware of. First, let me say that I am not a banner waving member of the NYRA fan club. I do think and want them to retain the franchise -- but under certain conditions; more on that later. Second, I do think NYRA has done some terrible things, mostly in the past. When they tapped into the NYTHA/horsemen's accounts -- that was unacceptable and unjustifiable. It was downright wrong. No excuses. NYRA also has never offered "transparency" in several areas and were not cooperative in any way, shape or form when it came to negotiating with the NYTHA regarding the VLT revenue split deal. They refused to work with and negotiate with the NYTHA. Of course there is more, but that's history.
Now, let me clarify something about this nonprofit topic -- nonprofit is a tax status it is not a management style. In addition, there is no blanket law or section of the tax code that states a nonprofit doesn't get to "keep" money. There are many types of nonprofits. You cannot compare NYRA to a hospital, school system, an endowment or an operating foundation. They are entities of a totally different nature and breed (no pun intended). As far as NYRA retaining the franchise, personally, I think it is best for bettors, owners, trainers, and racing in general. However, I think they need to change their mindset. They need to be more cooperative and open. They need to get rid of the arrogance and isolationism. They need to be more of a team player. Plus, they need a new business model. If VLT's weren't coming to NY -- nobody, absolutely nobody would be bidding on the franchise. Tax rates and certain mandated and legislated fees must be changed. Other fees and charges that must be paid to the state must be changed. It was more feasible and viable to pay these dollars out in pre-OTB days as well as pre-simulcasting days. The simulcasting model is also not in line vis a vis internet betting, telephone wagering, etc. VLT's are not the answer. However, what is is the "alternative revenue" model. Look at where Keeneland gets major dollars from -- not VLT's, but from revenue that is generated from the sales company. That subsidy, for lack of a better word, is thrown back into the racing side of the game -- purses, facility, backstretch, etc. The Woodbine model, economically works. A quasi-partnership between the racing industry, the VLT partner, and the provincial government. The other bidders for the franchise are taking a totally different approach. There is nothing wrong with that and that doesn't make it wrong. However, there is no history there. The other bidders are the upstarts -- yes, with allegedly plenty of money -- and are looking to make this their "first" time. That's an important aspect to remember. I don't think it's exactly applicable -- however, let's remember that the devil you know is far less dangerous than the devil you don't know. Eric |
#20
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|