Cruel and Unusual Punishment?

[dellinger63]

Originally Posted by Riot

You mean, when the line in the PPACA specifically prohibiting the IRS from collecting or attempting to collect those fines is in effect, too?

You've got dog **** all over your face. Ewwww.

Guess 45 mins is a long time to remember.

November 8, 2011 9:21 PM
By The Associated Press NEDRA PICKLER (Associated Press)

WASHINGTON - (AP) -- A conservative-leaning appeals court panel on Tuesday upheld the constitutionality of President Barack Obama's health care law, as the Supreme Court prepares to consider this week whether to resolve conflicting rulings over the law's requirement that all Americans buy health care insurance.

A panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia issued a split opinion upholding the lower court's ruling that found Congress did not overstep its authority in requiring people to have insurance or pay a penalty on their taxes, beginning in 2014. The requirement is the most controversial requirement of Obama's signature domestic legislative achievement and the focus of conflicting opinions from judges across the country. The Supreme Court could decide as early as Thursday during a closed meeting of the justices whether to accept appeals from some of those earlier rulings.

As far as dog crap on the face, look into the mirror!

[Riot]

Originally Posted by dellinger63

Guess 45 mins is a long time to remember.

As far as dog crap on the face, look into the mirror!

You're just too simple-minded to understand this, I guess ... the additional sentence in the PPACA prohibiting the IRS from collecting those taxes is still in the PPACA, and will be there deliberately until the Congress takes it out.

Yes, there is language in there outlining fines. There is ALSO a sentence in there prohibiting the collection of those fines.

That sentence was put there on purpose, so the penalties didn't automatically kick in. The Congress will have to take the sentence out after they see the bill up and running, if they want penalties. They will not have to rewrite the entire bill for penalties, as the language will already be there. They just have to remove the prohibitory language to make the fines kick in, if they someday want to.

Do you not read any real facts about the PPACA? Ever?

[dellinger63]

Originally Posted by Riot

Do you not read any real facts about the PPACA? Ever?

What in I'M NOT INTERESTED in fact WE'RE NOT INTERESTED don't you understand?

I think the USPO, SS, HHS, Fannie, Freddie etc etc are all failures while you think of them as family.

The majority of the country does not want PPACA and the doubletalk bs hidden within it. Now the only question should be how do we put the majority on the 'do not call' list?

[Riot]

Originally Posted by dellinger63

What in I'M NOT INTERESTED in fact WE'RE NOT INTERESTED don't you understand?

You don't have to shout - it's clear you don't have a clue what the PPACA is factually about You are factually ignorant about what it contains. And proud of it.

[dellinger63]

Originally Posted by Riot

You are factually ignorant about what it contains. And proud of it.

Just like if Earl Scheib saying he'll paint any car any color for $29.95!

If P.T. Barnum was alive he'd have you broke after a five minute chat.

Big Clue: If Obamacare saved money there would be no need for taxes and or penalties.

[SOREHOOF]

There would be no waivers for the politically connected either.

[Danzig]

there should be rules about grass heights, etc, but that fine amount is obscene. i'd wager you could find other rules without as high a fee, that might be considered as being a more serious offense.