Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > The Steve Dellinger Discourse Den
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-29-2011, 02:00 PM
Riot's Avatar
Riot Riot is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 14,153
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dino View Post
My only point with New Hampshire was with hard work and PRIDE this country can get back to what it was before so many people were looking for a handout.
Who the hell is looking for a handout? Social Security and Medicare are not "handouts", we pay into that!
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-29-2011, 02:26 PM
Coach Pants
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I believe you're paying in about 25% of the actual cost of Medicare.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-29-2011, 03:27 PM
Riot's Avatar
Riot Riot is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 14,153
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Coach Pants View Post
I believe you're paying in about 25% of the actual cost of Medicare.
Medicare is one of the most successful, least-expensive health delivery systems anywhere in the world. Their overhead and healthcare delivery cost is nothing compared to private insurance companies.

That said, yes, we need to look at adjusting Medicare. I suggest we simply open it up to people 55 and over, for a huge cash influx.
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-29-2011, 08:18 PM
Danzig Danzig is offline
Dee Tee Stables
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: The Natural State
Posts: 29,943
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Riot View Post
Medicare is one of the most successful, least-expensive health delivery systems anywhere in the world. Their overhead and healthcare delivery cost is nothing compared to private insurance companies.

That said, yes, we need to look at adjusting Medicare. I suggest we simply open it up to people 55 and over, for a huge cash influx.
surely you jest. medicare is outrageous, with only part a included if you have forty credits...otherwise, a alone is over 500 per month. that only covers hospitalization, with deductibles per incident, not per year. part b costs extra, that is for doctor care, also expensive...you have to buy supplements to pay deductibles, with plan f paying the most...if you can afford plan f that is...
and the hosp deductible per event? equal to the price of three pints of blood...one pint can cost 2500.
most insurance has a yearly deductible, but not medicare.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-29-2011, 08:24 PM
Danzig Danzig is offline
Dee Tee Stables
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: The Natural State
Posts: 29,943
Default

also, there are no out of pocket maximums in medicare, no stop loss.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-29-2011, 09:14 PM
Riot's Avatar
Riot Riot is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 14,153
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Danzig View Post
surely you jest. medicare is outrageous, with only part a included if you have forty credits...otherwise, a alone is over 500 per month.
No, you completely misunderstood. I'm talking from the health care delivery side.

It is one of the most-successful, least expensive health delivery systems in the world. It has very little overhead, it costs little to run, with nearly every dollar in the system going to medical care for those in the system.

As opposed to private insurance, where a great portion of premiums go to both administrative costs and profit-taking, with very little going to paying for actual health care for the insured.
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-29-2011, 10:51 PM
Danzig Danzig is offline
Dee Tee Stables
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: The Natural State
Posts: 29,943
Default

least expensive for whom? certainly not the patient, who pays for medicare in every check til retirement...then must pay for part b, for deductibles per occurrence, not oer year...who has no out of pocket max, must buy supplements to cover charges per day after so many days...
and you better show improvement, as medicare stops paying if you don't. its off to the nursing home then, which medicare pays exactly zero for.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-29-2011, 11:47 PM
Riot's Avatar
Riot Riot is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 14,153
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Danzig View Post
least expensive for whom?
As I said, Medicare is one of the least expensive insurance delivery systems, very efficient, with most of the dollars going to patient care - the government does it way better than privates.

And yeah, that efficiency is why the government can charge 70 and 80-year olds much less than any private company would, if someone could even get private insurance at that age at a remotely affordable price without exclusions for everything (cancer, cardiac, etc)

The alternative used to be no insurance whatsoever, until we decided to start Medicare. Because old people couldn't get and afford insurance when they needed it most.

So complaining about Medicare seems pretty silly. Try to get private insurance such as the Ryan plan recommends. The GOP Medicare plan is, "Crawl off and die in the woods, Granny"

It would be great to bring the cost of Medicare down even more, and increase coverage.

First start would be not to privatize it as the GOP wants (what a disaster!) but to increase government involvement, to allow the government to bargain for drug prices as the private insurance companies are allowed to do now. That would be huge savings, billions.

Then, open up Medicare to a healthier population. Start with people 50 or 55 and older. As a preface to opening it up to the entire population.

I don't know where you are getting your figures, most of the older people I know pay $300-$400 a month for their health insurance supplemental needs while on Medicare. Considering it would be at least a thousand dollars from a private insurer, with nothing covered (no cancer, no cardiac, etc) it's a damn good deal in my eyes! And Medicaid pays for nursing homes if the patient didn't plan for that.
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.