OK For Democrats to Have Sex with Minors

[Downthestretch55]

Originally Posted by timmgirvan

Now that you have all the 'primal scream' out of your system...take my response line by line...I said why put up a picture of someone(hastert)being fried in the press and labeling the picture...that picture says it all(your words) If you were an artist,what would be your point(with that picture)be? I certainly read those articles,but because I disagreed with them,I didnt bring them up. You're making a mountain out of a molehill. You're not the topic...you supplied the topic(picture) I just asked your reason for doing so(other than the obvious) I noticed your keystrokes got stuck there for a moment....hope your BP's ok! btw...you never had a 3rd grader like me..trust me

timm,
Unless you can do better than "primal scream", and the fact that you didn't read what I said about Hastert looking stressed, there really isn't much more to "discuss".
Face it...the press had no access to the hearings.
I said the truth will be found.
I believe that justice will be served.
Deal with it.

[timmgirvan]

Originally Posted by Downthestretch55

timm,
Unless you can do better than "primal scream", and the fact that you didn't read what I said about Hastert looking stressed, there really isn't much more to "discuss".
Face it...the press had no access to the hearings.
I said the truth will be found.
I believe that justice will be served.
Deal with it.

So you just put up a picture of Hastert looking stressed for fun? I told you I read the articles...are you so busy formulating a witty response that you fail to READ mine. I must give you too much credit. Have you never heard the phase "court of public opinion"? My Lord....I know they were closed door hearings. Believe me...I'm not shaking in my boots...no matter what they find. Oh damn, you'll answer me after dinner,right?

[Downthestretch55]

Originally Posted by timmgirvan

So you just put up a picture of Hastert looking stressed for fun? I told you I read the articles...are you so busy formulating a witty response that you fail to READ mine. I must give you too much credit. Have you never heard the phase "court of public opinion"? My Lord....I know they were closed door hearings. Believe me...I'm not shaking in my boots...no matter what they find. Oh damn, you'll answer me after dinner,right?

timm,
I apologize for giving more credit to your debating "skills" than I originally surmised.
Count up how many times you've used the word "you" in this quoted post.
I really thought there was more to offer.
Please clear up the confusion.
In an earlier post you claimed that you disagreed with the articles I posted.
Exactly, what is there to disgree with? Cite the statements that you disagree with and reasons for disagreement.
I think you're blowing it out your hole.
Please prove otherwise.
Cute ain't "cute".

DTS

ps..dinner: steak, baked potato, broccolli.

[timmgirvan]

DTS: the person I'm directing this response to is the only person who put up a picture and captioned it..This person is confused....as I am the only other person in the conversation! Here's the thing...I don't want to talk about the articles(they're nothing new) I just wanted a simple answer...why did the poster use this picture? and for what purpose... Apparently you did enroll in the "clinton online debating class". Summ cum Laude, I'll bet! Dinner looked nice! I doubt I'll get that lucky

[Downthestretch55]

Originally Posted by timmgirvan

DTS: the person I'm directing this response to is the only person who put up a picture and captioned it..This person is confused....as I am the only other person in the conversation! Here's the thing...I don't want to talk about the articles(they're nothing new) I just wanted a simple answer...why did the poster use this picture? and for what purpose... Apparently you did enroll in the "clinton online debating class". Summ cum Laude, I'll bet! Dinner looked nice! I doubt I'll get that lucky

timm,
I'm no longer confused.
Thanks for stating that you "don't wish to talk about the articles".
That speaks volumes.
Why did they use that picture? Hmm...ask the editor of the NY Times.
This line of "thinking" is ridiculous.
I truly thought you had better.
"clinton online debating class"...geesh!

[timmgirvan]

Originally Posted by Downthestretch55

timm,
I'm no longer confused.
Thanks for stating that you "don't wish to talk about the articles".
That speaks volumes.
Why did they use that picture? Hmm...ask the editor of the NY Times.
This line of "thinking" is ridiculous.
I truly thought you had better.
"clinton online debating class"...geesh!

I said that I had read the articles and didn't want to rehash old news! DTS: the poster of the picture on this forum is YOU...WTF do I care(as if I didn't know) why they used the picture. I care about why you posted it. Btw...If I don't have something to say...then I can't be speaking volumes. I thought the Clinton thing was great,as both of you tend to focus on the little things! However...let me say emphatically that I don't think you're are self-obsessed, as is the former! I really hope you are clear now. Ballgame coming on....gone now!

[Downthestretch55]

Originally Posted by timmgirvan

I said that I had read the articles and didn't want to rehash old news! DTS: the poster of the picture on this forum is YOU...WTF do I care(as if I didn't know) why they used the picture. I care about why you posted it. Btw...If I don't have something to say...then I can't be speaking volumes. I thought the Clinton thing was great,as both of you tend to focus on the little things! However...let me say emphatically that I don't think you're are self-obsessed, as is the former! I really hope you are clear now. Ballgame coming on....gone now!

Timm,
I'm very clear regarding the topic that you'd like to discuss. You typed it in caps.
Obviously, you do not wish to discuss the Hastert/Reynolds/Foley topic, which is what I thought this thread was really about.
The links I posted deal with this topic. I posted them because they are informative.
Since you couldn't cite one thing that you disagreed with in either of them and only keep asking why I posted them, my suspicion is that you don't wish to discuss the topic.
The answer to your question: this topic is in the news.