Nakatini + Balleto = ummmm???

Originally Posted by hoovesupsideyourhead

mike im just saying ..if javy cast...wins on a horse ..comes off a layoff or is in a bad spot with rudy r up and has trouble wide ect..then javy takes the mount again you dont think that matters......

Only if I think the horse has a shot, its sure not gonna make me play the horse if I don't like him.

[hoovesupsideyourhead]

ok..this is going nowhere...youll never admit it..

Originally Posted by hoovesupsideyourhead

ok..this is going nowhere...youll never admit it..

Hooves why would I admit something if I don't do it?
I play horses before I play jockeys.
I will play a horse on a blind trainer switch angle though, that i will do!!!

[cakes44]

I'll have no problem throwing out Spun Sugar in the Distaff because of Mike Luzzi.

[blackthroatedwind]

Originally Posted by cakes44

I'll have no problem throwing out Spun Sugar in the Distaff because of Mike Luzzi.

Yeah, that will be why she loses.......Luzzi.

He certainly blew the ride on her in the Go for Wand.

Here's a hint...you know you're on the right track when you bet a horse, the horses are loading in the gate, and you have to look down at your form or program to see who's riding your horse.

[cakes44]

Sounds good to me, blackthroat. Put your $ on Spun Sugar. Luzzi's horrendous judge of pace and inability to get a horse to relax give this horse no shot in this race. There's a reason why he's never won a BC race, and rarely even gets a mount for that matter even though he's based in New York year round.

[blackthroatedwind]

Originally Posted by cakes44

Sounds good to me, blackthroat. Put your $ on Spun Sugar. Luzzi's horrendous judge of pace and inability to get a horse to relax give this horse no shot in this race. There's a reason why he's never won a BC race, and rarely even gets a mount for that matter even though he's based in New York year round.

First of all, my friend, I never said I was betting Spun Sugar, and had you carefully read what I wrote you would have seen that I was suggesting that when Spun Sugar loses it won't be Luzzi's fault.

I also never said that Luzzi is a GREAT rider, though I happen to think he rides just fine, and if he had the mounts that John Velasquez has his win totally would be at most negigibly less.

The real point of my post is that people who waste time overly worrying about who is riding a horse are also losing bettors at the racetrack. Of that I have no doubt.