![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
By the way, this "slow" horse improved his top Beyer by 13 points in his sophomore debut, and has a graded two-turn win over the CD surface. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Slow horses win Classics all the time. See Drosselslug
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Non sequitur.
The whole field was slow. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Umm, Super Saver anyone
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() What about him?
You mean another slow horse beating another slow field, over the only track in the world he could have possibly won the race over, with a perfect trip? |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Giacomo...should I continue. Just shut the hell up
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Again. That might have been the worst Derby field in 20 years, except for Afleet Alex.
You do remember what happened to Afleet Alex, right? Or maybe you think Mo isn't as good as AA, I don't know. Either way, you are both wrong and a moron. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I don't give a sh it what he does, or where he does it, but he is far from a " complete wild card. " That's all.
__________________
Just more nebulous nonsense from BBB |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
And feel free to define "wild card". My point is that he is going to the Derby off of a synthetic prep, which will very probably mask any progress he has continued to make since turning three. Maybe he hasn't progressed any more than he showed in his last start. Or maybe he has. Who knows? I don't. So I'm calling him a wild card. Sorry. A COMPLETE wild card. |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]() The Packers were a Wild Card this year. So there.
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Le Prince in the 1990 Travers. That would have been a complete wild card. |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
To me, as I explained earlier, a "wild card" is a horse whose talent level isn't was well established as many of his opponents. Santiva was not fast enough to compete with the likes of Uncle Mo, The Factor, etc. as a juvenile. In his only race this year, he ran well and earned a much higher fig than anything he had produced last year. He will have one more race before the Derby, and that race will be over synthetic- meaning it won't tell me all I would like to know about his form or talent level. Thus, at least as far as I am concerned, there will be a big question mark next to his name. So I called him a wild card. |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]() I get your reasoning now.
The Kentucky Derby will be Uncle Mo versus 19 complete wild cards. |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Now you're being completely ridiculous as opposed to just ridiculous.
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Sounds reasonable to me. Just because justindew is the one who made the point doesn't automatically make it completely ridiculous. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
__________________
Just more nebulous nonsense from BBB |
#17
|
||||
|
||||
![]() For the record, I intend to really step up my posting game in the coming weeks. No more blatant (though apparently not obvious to all) attempts to rile people up.
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I consider you a flatliner.
__________________
Just more nebulous nonsense from BBB |
#19
|
||||
|
||||
![]() I know of no one on DT who would disagree with you there. But I've got some posts planned for the coming weeks that will really knock your socks off.
You also haven't accepted my Facebook friend request yet. |
#20
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Yep....he hired me a few weeks ago.
I thought stating that everything he says isn't "automatically wrong" just because he is the one saying it was a nice, conservative way to get started on the job. I guess not. Too much too soon. Perhaps I should have started even more conservatively and said something like..."hey he's bound to be at least partially right one of these days, right?" Either way, I plan to execute this assignment so wonderfully that DrugS is facebooking him for handicapping tips by the middle of June. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|