vic off his meds..

[RockHardTen1985]

Originally Posted by v j stauffer

I think if both ran their best race Zenyatta would win. OMG send the troops I should be killed.

I stongly agree, others do, but are affraid to speak on it.

[Dahoss]

Afraid of what? Someone disagreeing with them?

[RockHardTen1985]

[quote=Dahoss;715363]Afraid of what? Someone disagreeing with them?[/QUOTE

Afraid of the Rachel is better period argument, that then leads to insults from the same 3-5 people.

[Dahoss]

So afraid of another opinion. Maybe the pretty horsey boards would be better for those afraid.

[Rudeboyelvis]

[quote=RockHardTen1985;715364]

Originally Posted by Dahoss

Afraid of what? Someone disagreeing with them?[/QUOTE

Afraid of the Rachel is better period argument, that then leads to insults from the same 3-5 people.

Joseph we need a cypher

[the_fat_man]

[quote=RockHardTen1985;715364]

Originally Posted by Dahoss

Afraid of what? Someone disagreeing with them?[/QUOTE

Afraid of the Rachel is better period argument, that then leads to insults from the same 3-5 people.

Originally Posted by RockHardTen1985

I stongly agree, others do, but are affraid to speak on it.

A, which is lesser quality than B, beats C in a race. As a result, C's connections FAIL to HONOR their COMMITMENT for the AB, which is won by B (EASILY). C is then retired later in the year, before the BC. It follows that C is MUCH BETTER than B. Hey, it's not like just any horse can lose to the great Persistently.

ha ha ha

All the MOFO's making this 'argument' seriously need to consider getting BACK on their MEDS.

[Dahoss]

[quote=the_fat_man;715370]

Originally Posted by RockHardTen1985

A, which is lesser quality than B, beats C in a race. As a result, C's connections FAIL to HONOR their COMMITMENT for the AB. C is then retired later in the year, before the BC. It follows that C is MUCH BETTER than B.

ha ha ha

All the MOFO's making this 'argument' seriously need to consider getting BACK on their MEDS.

Get over it already man.

[ateamstupid]

Originally Posted by RockHardTen1985

I stongly agree, others do, but are affraid to speak on it.

Classic. We shall overcommmmmee. Yeah, there's a real shortage of tards who scream about Zenyatta > Rachel.

Originally Posted by Dahoss

Get over it already man.

You realize who you're talking to, right?

[Smooth Operator]

Originally Posted by the_fat_man

A, which is lesser quality than B, beats C in a race. As a result, C's connections FAIL to HONOR their COMMITMENT for the AB, which is won by B (EASILY). C is then retired later in the year, before the BC. It follows that C is MUCH BETTER than B. Hey, it's not like just any horse can lose to the great Persistently.

ha ha ha

All the MOFO's making this 'argument' seriously need to consider getting BACK on their MEDS.

LOL … great stuff, Fats


Unfortunately the RA fans can't handle the TRUTH…

[Clip-Clop]

[quote=the_fat_man;715370]

Originally Posted by RockHardTen1985

A, which is lesser quality than B, beats C in a race. As a result, C's connections FAIL to HONOR their COMMITMENT for the AB, which is won by B (EASILY). C is then retired later in the year, before the BC. It follows that C is MUCH BETTER than B. Hey, it's not like just any horse can lose to the great Persistently.

ha ha ha

All the MOFO's making this 'argument' seriously need to consider getting BACK on their MEDS.

Only true if B beats A. Theory requires this to make it stand. This is the scientific method. Opinions have no place in this theory.

[ateamstupid]

Unfortunately the Zentards can't handle that there's no longer a relevant horse to endlessly denigrate in order to validate and prop up their paper champion.

[CSC]

Originally Posted by ateamstupid

Unfortunately the Zentards can't handle that there's no longer a relevant horse to endlessly denigrate in order to validate and prop up their paper champion.

From a monetary point of view, the reality is Jess deprived a few sharp handicappers around the world a chance of betting against Rachel in the distaff. She would have been a vast underlay and players look for chances to bet overhyped horses like this every year.

[ateamstupid]

Originally Posted by CSC

From a monetary point of view, the reality is Jess deprived a few sharp handicappers around the world a chance of betting against Rachel in the distaff. She would have been a vast underlay and players look for chances to bet overhyped horses like this every year.

Yeah, you're a sharp handicapper. I'm surprised you can even spell Distaff. You do realize Zenyatta at 8-5 is the underlay of the millenium, right? Those sharpies will still have their opportunity. Unless they were just Zenyattards, in which case they'll line up in droves to get fleeced on Saturday.

[Rudeboyelvis]

Oh
Mine
Got

[Clip-Clop]

Originally Posted by CSC

From a monetary point of view, the reality is Jess deprived a few sharp handicappers around the world a chance of betting against Rachel in the distaff. She would have been a vast underlay and players look for chances to bet overhyped horses like this every year.

She would lose to Blind Luck, just like every other horse in that race. Best female in the country that Blind Luck.

[Smooth Operator]

Originally Posted by Clip-Clop

She would lose to Blind Luck, just like every other horse in that race. Best female in the country that Blind Luck.

You must be blind…

[Smooth Operator]

Yeah, was Battaglia high on crack cocaine when he made Z 8/5?

Would like nothing more than to see her roll here … but 8/5 is ridiculous for a 6yo mare in this race.

[Clip-Clop]

Originally Posted by Smooth Operator

You must be blind…

I know, running in and winning most of the time, all those restricted GI races all over the country doesn't mean anything to YOU, but it does (should) merit a lot of respect. Agree with you completely on the odds, 8/5 is silly but it will probably be even lower. People like to bet sentiment.

[dagolfer33]

Originally Posted by RockHardTen1985

I stongly agree, others do, but are affraid to speak on it.

I am not afraid to say, I am only using 2 horses in the classic: Haynesfield and Zenyatta. Now, I am afraid to be aligned with you in this race, any football or basketball game, or any other thing for that matter.

[DerbyCat]

Originally Posted by dagolfer33

I am not afraid to say, I am only using 2 horses in the classic: Haynesfield and Zenyatta. Now, I am afraid to be aligned with you in this race, any football or basketball game, or any other thing for that matter.

golfer, you're not alone... Zenyatta will be in my picks, along with Lookin At Lucky. I think I'm goin ALL in the turf race in my P4