Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Main Forum > The Paddock
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-11-2006, 09:59 AM
Revolution's Avatar
Revolution Revolution is offline
Hawthorne
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 524
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cajungator26
Polytrack will change the horse racing world PERIOD. I don't think it has as much to do with making money as it does the fact that the business is being drastically changed. Some people don't just roll over when things like this happen... it takes an adjustment period. Until you can learn to make your own decisions (without consulting your "friend's brother"), perhaps you should keep your mouth shut about it. Let me know when you've made up your own mind about it.

I do make my own decisions. I was just telling you that he said Aqueduct and Belmont will have tracks with the surfaces soon enough. And saying it doesn't have much to do with making money is naive. Everything in horse racing is about money. Everything.

Don't ever tell me to keep my mouth shut either. I am allowed ot have an opinion.

Last edited by Revolution : 10-11-2006 at 10:14 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-11-2006, 10:01 AM
Coach Pants
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Revolution
I do make my own decisions. I was just telling you that he said Aqueduct and Belmont will have tracks with the surfaces soon enough. And saying it doesn't have much to do with making money is naive. Everything in horse racing is about money. Everything.

Don't ever tell me to keep my mouth shut either. Get some class.
I think it's about the health of the horse.

Now shut yo mouf!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-11-2006, 10:04 AM
Revolution's Avatar
Revolution Revolution is offline
Hawthorne
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 524
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pillow Pants
I think it's about the health of the horse.

Now shut yo mouf!
Healthy horses run more often and have cheaper vet bills. It is about money. If it was all about health of horses, maybe you should spend some time at the racetrack and explain to me what happens to horses when they are no longer healthy enough to race. If you don't know, perhaps you should just keep your head in the clouds. Horse racing is a business. Nothing else.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-11-2006, 10:09 AM
Coach Pants
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Revolution
Healthy horses run more often and have cheaper vet bills. It is about money. If it was all about health of horses, maybe you should spend some time at the racetrack and explain to me what happens to horses when they are no longer healthy enough to race. If you don't know, perhaps you should just keep your head in the clouds. Horse racing is a business. Nothing else.
Hey genius. If it wasn't for horses breaking down then polytrack and it's competitors wouldn't be considered by track management. Thus, the number one reason for the installation is exactly what I stated. Of course cost cutting was considered, but you act like it's the primary reason and that simply isn't the case.

Like Keeneland is desperately looking at ways to save money.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-11-2006, 10:14 AM
Revolution's Avatar
Revolution Revolution is offline
Hawthorne
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 524
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pillow Pants
Hey genius. If it wasn't for horses breaking down then polytrack and it's competitors wouldn't be considered by track management. Thus, the number one reason for the installation is exactly what I stated. Of course cost cutting was considered, but you act like it's the primary reason and that simply isn't the case.

Like Keeneland is desperately looking at ways to save money.
Keeneland owns 50% of the company that owns polytrack. It is awesome that is saves horses, but it was all about money. The injuries are bad for pr and the amount of races cancelled at places like turfway were a big factor.

Polytrack has been in europe for some time, and like everything else, horse racing is going through it's globalization. They are trying to get the top horses from the world to compete against each other more regularly. Polytrack was the only hope. Turf horses run fine over it.

You don't need to call me names either. If you don't like my friend that doesn't mean I am like that. I stick to horse racing.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-11-2006, 10:16 AM
Coach Pants
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Revolution
Keeneland owns 50% of the company that owns polytrack. It is awesome that is saves horses, but it was all about money. The injuries are bad for pr and the amount of races cancelled at places like turfway were a big factor.

Polytrack has been in europe for some time, and like everything else, horse racing is going through it's globalization. They are trying to get the top horses from the world to compete against each other more regularly. Polytrack was the only hope. Turf horses run fine over it.

You don't need to call me names either. If you don't like my friend that doesn't mean I am like that. I stick to horse racing.
In the poly vs. dirt thread that you made your first point was that it reduces the number of breakdowns.

I'm going to leave it at that.

Good day, sir.

Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-11-2006, 10:17 AM
oracle80
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pillow Pants
In the poly vs. dirt thread that you made your first point was that it reduces the number of breakdowns.

I'm going to leave it at that.

Good day, sir.

As would a deeper, safer cushion and a deeper, safer top layer harrowed deeper. Touche, as you say.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-11-2006, 10:16 AM
oracle80
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pillow Pants
I think it's about the health of the horse.

Now shut yo mouf!
Pillow its about money, and nothing more.
The health is just an excuse. They could have installed a deeper base and harrowed the surface deeper and had the same results years ago. But there wasn't 8-10 million in some truckloads of dirt and the guy harrowing the track deeper. You aren't really that naiive are you?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-11-2006, 10:17 AM
Coach Pants
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by oracle80
Pillow its about money, and nothing more.
The health is just an excuse. They could have installed a deeper base and harrowed the surface deeper and had the same results years ago. But there wasn't 8-10 million in some truckloads of dirt and the guy harrowing the track deeper. You aren't really that naiive are you?
I already explained myself and i'm correct and you're wrong.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:18 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.