![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Why don't they just put the poor horsey in a retirement home?
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() At least RA's connections moved out of their comfort zone and ran RA at a distance that wasn't going to be her best. They could have run her in the Molly Pitcher instead and then pointed for the Beldame.
__________________
Still trying to outsmart me, aren't you, mule-skinner? You want me to think that you don't want me to go down there, but the subtle truth is you really don't want me to go down there! |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I've been pretty busy today.
I guess from reading here that Rachel Alexandra did not win in a short field that most here seemed to think was a walkover? The winner paid $45? For anyone who played exactas with the field with Rachel on the bottom, the $8 wager returned $94.00? NEVER would have guessed that Rachel Alexandra would hit the board in a five horse field and still the trifecta would pay $228. Now I have a better understanding of how Chicago/Arkansas/Bill's Wife Hillary Clinton became a US Senator from New York. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() So let's see, you know nothing about the race, but you still think it appropriate to deride everyone who didn't see the obvious $45 winner that had a career top BSF of 85 and hadn't developed a step since 2008. Even for a redboarder, that's lame.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I tried to beat Rachel with my plays in her prior race. Yesterday an $18 tri box with Rachel and the field returned $228. $16 exacta boxes with Rachel and the field returned $94. I find it freaking amazing that the exotic wagers were so top loaded. And po'd I missed it. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|