Quote:
Originally Posted by NTamm1215
Lookin at Lucky? Are we talking about the same horse? I know you were one of the first to say that Blame's win in the Foster would be overrated but Lookin at Lucky, really?
You must think he's going to do a lot of improving between now and the Breeders' Cup. Blame has run a number of races that are better than Lookin at Lucky's best.
NT
|
I have felt since day 1 that Lookin at Lucky has been an underrated horse.
People assume that since he was the 2yo champ he would not develop into a nice 3yo, but the way I see it, he was your atypical 2yo champion.
I thought that him being a late foal might possibly work to his advantage because he still had maturing to do and had more upside than most 2yo champs going into their three year old year.
I believe this has played out mostly true. If you completely dismiss his 2yo season and treat him as a late to get started 3yo, you'd see that he's a horse still on the improve. He's getting stronger, his races are getting faster and he's winning more easily as well (though getting off that synthetic crap might have a big part of this). If you toss his SA Derby and Ky Derby races, he's shown to have gotten better with each start, with his best two to date being the Preakness and Haskell.
And yeah, I do believe it to be a reasonable thing, tossing his two derbies.
Now, I'm not saying he's the next super horse, but I do believe him to be a really nice horse that does not get the respect that he should.
08-07-2010, 08:52 PM
Hybrid Mode
