RACHEL JUNE 12th

[VOL JACK]

Originally Posted by Merlinsky

http://www.ntra.com/content/display/news/NDU4MTQ=

NTRA thinks so too. Thing is, now they're saying only Distinctive Dixie's a probable besides Rachel. She finished 6th behind Unrivaled Belle, RA, and a 5th place Zardana in the La Troienne. Hmm. I imagine them going through the barns calling 'anybody want a G2 placing for their mare? Step right up, a guaranteed 3rd or better in a G2....'

Dude, NTRA cuts and paste the DRF article.

[Duvalier]

By e-mail through his public-relations representative, Caroline Shaw, Jackson reiterated that "as long as she continues to progress, we intend to race her with the expectation that she will obtain her fitness level of last year."

Looks like she still won't be 100% fit for the Fleur de Lis...guess we'll have to wait for the next race and next press release from Jackson.

[Indian Charlie]

Originally Posted by Duvalier

By e-mail through his public-relations representative, Caroline Shaw, Jackson reiterated that "as long as she continues to progress, we intend to race her with the expectation that she will obtain her fitness level of last year."

Looks like she still won't be 100% fit for the Fleur de Lis...guess we'll have to wait for the next race and next press release from Jackson.

Guess we didn't have to wait long for the next idiotic remark from a Zenyattard.

[10 pnt move up]

Originally Posted by Indian Charlie

Guess we didn't have to wait long for the next idiotic remark from a Zenyattard.

The comment "fitness level" is funny.

[Duvalier]

Originally Posted by Indian Charlie

Guess we didn't have to wait long for the next idiotic remark from a Zenyattard.

Shouldn't you be stalking some other posters on the board...you freaking weirdo.

[Indian Charlie]

Originally Posted by Duvalier

Shouldn't you be stalking some other posters on the board...you freaking weirdo.

Nope. Just you and the rest of the gang.

[Merlinsky]

Originally Posted by VOL JACK

Dude, NTRA cuts and paste the DRF article.

Dude, I don't care. I didn't read the DRF article, and NTRA's running of the article themselves might as well be "We concur." A little tightly wound today, are we? Geez. I got it on NTRA's website, so excuuuse me..