Zenyatta assigned 129 pounds for Vanity

[CSC]

Originally Posted by NTamm1215

I see, it's all so easy when you let the surface lines completely blur. I mean, who wouldn't take into consideration whether a horse is actually running on their preferred surface? After all, if you do that, how does the 2009 BC Classic field look?

NT

I've been down that road here, with this 95% Pro-Rachel board. Unless Zenyatta wins on dirt, travels, runs a minimum 115 beyer, beats Quality Road, carries 130 doing so, and runs against the bias. It may, JUST may satisfy her detractors. Though I'm not holding onto that belief. But I guess even I can be surprised sometimes.

[NTamm1215]

Originally Posted by CSC

I've been down that road here, with this 95% Pro-Rachel board. Unless Zenyatta wins on dirt, travels, runs a minimum 115 beyer, beats Quality Road, carries 130 doing so, and runs against the bias. It may, JUST may satisfy her detractors. Though I'm not holding onto that belief. But I guess even I can be surprised sometimes.

All I ask is that people comparing horses who have run on synthetics and dirt actually try to understand that many horses prefer one over the other. To diminish the quality of Unrivaled Belle because she lost a race on the Pro-Ride is foolish, especially given her prior dirt accomplishments and those she' accumulated since.

That argument drives me even more crazy than this incessant notion that Zenyatta is better on dirt.

NT

[CSC]

Originally Posted by NTamm1215

All I ask is that people comparing horses who have run on synthetics and dirt actually try to understand that many horses prefer one over the other. To diminish the quality of Unrivaled Belle because she lost a race on the Pro-Ride is foolish, especially given her prior dirt accomplishments and those she' accumulated since.

That argument drives me even more crazy than this incessant notion that Zenyatta is better on dirt.

NT

May I add then why is it okay to diminish horses that win on poly? I know some people hate the BC, but if Zenyatta makes it to the BC later this year, we may get to understand her specialness if she can duplicate her races on dirt. If this is the case, I would hope she will receive her derserved recognition for being versatile enough to win regardless of what surface she runs on. To me that is a far better measure of greatness than the limitations of a singular surface.

Originally Posted by CSC

I've been down that road here, with this 95% Pro-Rachel board. Unless Zenyatta wins on dirt, travels, runs a minimum 115 beyer, beats Quality Road, carries 130 doing so, and runs against the bias. It may, JUST may satisfy her detractors. Though I'm not holding onto that belief. But I guess even I can be surprised sometimes.

Oh poor you. Go f.uck yourself.

[Duvalier]

Stay classy

Originally Posted by Duvalier

Stay classy

That's one of the problems with the sport. The mirage of classiness. If more people would tell the psychotic to go f.uck themselves the better.

[Duvalier]

Originally Posted by Coach Pants

That's one of the problems with the sport. The mirage of classiness. If more people would tell the psychotic to go f.uck themselves the better.

You got a point. There are some instances where I see that being a good option.

[2Hot4TV]

Originally Posted by Coach Pants

That's one of the problems with the sport. The mirage of classiness. If more people would tell the psychotic to go f.uck themselves the better.

psychotic to go f.uck yourself.

Originally Posted by 2Hot4TV

psychotic to go f.uck yourself.

Same to ya and I hope you get pancreatic cancer.

[2Hot4TV]

Originally Posted by Coach Pants

Same to ya and I hope you get pancreatic cancer.

I already have





































bladder Cancer, is that good enough?

[CSC]

Originally Posted by Duvalier

Stay classy

People cannot just say they disagree, coming from him it isn't unexpected, it's par for the course. We all can't be raised with class.

Originally Posted by CSC

People cannot just say they disagree, coming from him it isn't unexpected, it's par for the course. We all can't be raised with class.

You're a man, not a battered woman.

[CSC]

Originally Posted by Coach Pants

You're a man, not a battered woman.

F.uck you.












Though I say that with a smile.

[Indian Charlie]

Originally Posted by CSC

People cannot just say they disagree, coming from him it isn't unexpected, it's par for the course. We all can't be raised with class.

Apparently, not all of us can be raised with a clue either.

[CSC]

Originally Posted by Indian Charlie

Apparently, not all of us can be raised with a clue either.

I relish these opportunities to fire back, what's your excuse then? Are you waiting for a field of Bullsbay's and or Macho Again's to fill before your horse crush gets off the schnide this year?

[NTamm1215]

Originally Posted by CSC

I relish these opportunities to fire back, what's your excuse then? Are you waiting for a field of Bullsbay's and or Macho Again's to fill before your horse crush gets off the schnide this year?

We had made it 25 posts in this thread without a mention of Rachel. There was even a video of a horse carrying 130 lbs and winning (!) but you had to come along and invoke Rachel Alexandra. I'm so glad you came back.

NT

[Indian Charlie]

Originally Posted by CSC

I relish these opportunities to fire back, what's your excuse then? Are you waiting for a field of Bullsbay's and or Macho Again's to fill before your horse crush gets off the schnide this year?

You relish these opportunities?

And that's the best you could do? Repeat the same old drivel?

Also, what crush are you talking about? I'm sure I've been pretty vocal (or verbal) here since early last year that people are ridiculously overrating RA.

Some of you Zenyattards are beyond ever being able to find that all elusive clue.