|
|
 |
|
|
|
#1
10-02-2006, 08:41 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
#3
10-02-2006, 08:46 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#4
10-02-2006, 08:47 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#5
10-02-2006, 08:49 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
The Chocolate Chip cookies Gander's wife made while I was there last month didn't help either.
LOL...poor Timmy turned his back for a few seconds and *poof*....they were gone 
|
|
#6
10-02-2006, 09:12 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Well I sure won't be betting anything but grass there.
The results at Turfway on Saturday just confirm that poly is just about impossible to bet. Ball Four is obviously a specialist on "poly" but I don't know anyone who would bet 50 cents on him against the field he just beat on dirt. And the juvenile stakes were pretty comical as well as far as outcomes. Reigning Court? You have to be kidding me. And the older filly and mare stakes was comical as well. I didn't bet a penny on that card, and my friends who did were home crying and broke after it was over. That card alone was a pretty good advertisement for why not to wager on Polytrack. Keeneland won't get a dime from me on anything but grass races.
|
|
#7
10-02-2006, 09:15 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Bingo!
I was starting to think I was wrong about the Poly and then took one look at the entries and results from KY Cup Day and knew that I was right all along. Those results make no sense and Keeneland will be a blender this Meet...
|
|
#8
10-02-2006, 10:09 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Yeah Kev, b/c you are really overweight. You don't even look remotely heavy.
|
|
#9
10-02-2006, 10:50 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Ahhh Kentucky Women.....SHHHHHHAAAWINNG
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
