Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > The Steve Dellinger Discourse Den
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-23-2010, 10:49 PM
ateamstupid's Avatar
ateamstupid ateamstupid is offline
Super Mod.. and Super Fly
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 13,036
Default

It is misguided you fugging idiot. People like you cry about the gov't "taking over your lives," but now you think it's cool for the cops to knock on doors and interrogate people looking for immigrants.

And keep shouting about November, as if the Republicans are going to get major gains running on platforms of no ideas and less ideas.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-23-2010, 10:57 PM
GBBob GBBob is offline
Hialeah Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,342
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ateamstupid View Post
It is misguided you fugging idiot. People like you cry about the gov't "taking over your lives," but now you think it's cool for the cops to knock on doors and interrogate people looking for immigrants.

And keep shouting about November, as if the Republicans are going to get major gains running on platforms of no ideas and less ideas.
Well..they will..only because every political party since forever makes major gains in the in between election of a sitting President whose party smoked the other previously. Except the Repubs will proclaim it's an indictment of the sitting anti-christ President and proceed to declare The Second Amendment includes shooting Democrats.

And then Obama will still win in 2012 and they will be forced to review the video of Chappequidik yet one more time.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-23-2010, 11:11 PM
ateamstupid's Avatar
ateamstupid ateamstupid is offline
Super Mod.. and Super Fly
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 13,036
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GBBob View Post
Well..they will..only because every political party since forever makes major gains in the in between election of a sitting President whose party smoked the other previously. Except the Repubs will proclaim it's an indictment of the sitting anti-christ President and proceed to declare The Second Amendment includes shooting Democrats.

And then Obama will still win in 2012 and they will be forced to review the video of Chappequidik yet one more time.
They'll pick up seats but I think the democrats will still have majorities. And that's really all we need in order to keep destroying America and eventually take everyone's guns away and use them for abortions.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-23-2010, 11:19 PM
GBBob GBBob is offline
Hialeah Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,342
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ateamstupid View Post
They'll pick up seats but I think the democrats will still have majorities. And that's really all we need in order to keep destroying America and eventually take everyone's guns away and use them for abortions.


But..isn't that OK because of the 2nd Amendment
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-24-2010, 12:44 PM
brianwspencer's Avatar
brianwspencer brianwspencer is offline
Atlantic City Race Course
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 4,894
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ateamstupid View Post
d eventually take everyone's guns away and use them for abortions.
*fingers crossed!*
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-24-2010, 01:42 PM
Danzig Danzig is offline
Dee Tee Stables
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: The Natural State
Posts: 29,942
Default

What am I missing about this law? It is against the law to be here illegally, right? If a policeman pulls you over and suspects you're drunk, he acts accordingly. Nervous? Maybe he suspects drugs or a gun. So he requests a search. You can refuse any of those. Again, he will act accordingly. But there's a problem if he attempts to ascertain if you're breaking an immigration law? Why?
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all.
Abraham Lincoln
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-24-2010, 02:28 PM
Rupert Pupkin Rupert Pupkin is offline
Del Mar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,102
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Danzig View Post
What am I missing about this law? It is against the law to be here illegally, right? If a policeman pulls you over and suspects you're drunk, he acts accordingly. Nervous? Maybe he suspects drugs or a gun. So he requests a search. You can refuse any of those. Again, he will act accordingly. But there's a problem if he attempts to ascertain if you're breaking an immigration law? Why?
I completely agree with you. You have these liberals that are up in arms about the law being enforced. What is wrong with enforcing the law? That being said, I agree with Obama that reform is needed. It makes no sense to call people "illegal aliens" and then treat them as if they are totally legal.

If we need these immigrants here (and we probably do need most of them), then we should make it legal for them to be here. The current situation makes no sense. We call these people illegal aliens and then allow them to stay here. It makes no sense. If we are going to allow them to stay here, then we should make it legal for them to be here.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-28-2010, 05:43 PM
Danzig Danzig is offline
Dee Tee Stables
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: The Natural State
Posts: 29,942
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Danzig View Post
What am I missing about this law? It is against the law to be here illegally, right? If a policeman pulls you over and suspects you're drunk, he acts accordingly. Nervous? Maybe he suspects drugs or a gun. So he requests a search. You can refuse any of those. Again, he will act accordingly. But there's a problem if he attempts to ascertain if you're breaking an immigration law? Why?

just moving this forward. i didn't get an answer from anyone on why the feds, mexico, or anyone else should be up in arms about this law. it wasn't a rhetorical question-i really want to know why this is a bad law, or misinformed, etc.
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all.
Abraham Lincoln
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-28-2010, 06:06 PM
Riot's Avatar
Riot Riot is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 14,153
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Danzig View Post
just moving this forward. i didn't get an answer from anyone on why the feds, mexico, or anyone else should be up in arms about this law. it wasn't a rhetorical question-i really want to know why this is a bad law, or misinformed, etc.
How about this: Your state can make it state law that it's a crime to not pay your federal income taxes. The wording can duplicate federal law. They can include a provision allowing them (the state) to look at and review your federal income tax return at their discretion, and for them to notify the IRS if the state workers thought your federal return wasn't accurate. Do you think that is constitutional?

The federal government controls immigration, not states. Our governmental system says a state doesn't have the right to intrude in federal law.

A example would be desegregation and the integration of schools. Federal law supercedes state law. And the feds will send in the troops to prove it (some states apparently didn't learn that from the Civil War)
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-28-2010, 06:31 PM
Princess Doreen's Avatar
Princess Doreen Princess Doreen is offline
Randwyck
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: VA and Saratoga
Posts: 1,352
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Danzig View Post
just moving this forward. i didn't get an answer from anyone on why the feds, mexico, or anyone else should be up in arms about this law. it wasn't a rhetorical question-i really want to know why this is a bad law, or misinformed, etc.
What a mess. Anyone who agrees with the State of Arizona is going to be called a racist, and the politicians in Washington are squirming in their seats and loosening their tie for fear of messing with Hispanic votes.

Here's an interesting read:

http://www.heritage.org/Research/Rep...s-Must-Do-More
__________________
I l Cigar, Medaglia d'Oro, Big Brown, Curlin, Rachel Alexandra, Silver Charm, First Samurai, Sumwonlovesyou, Lloydobler, Ausable Chasm, AND Prince Will I Am

"Be daring, be different, be impractical, be anything that will assert integrity of purpose and imaginative vision against the play-it-safers, the creatures of the commonplace, the slaves of the ordinary.” Cecil Beaton
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 05-01-2010, 06:07 AM
SCUDSBROTHER's Avatar
SCUDSBROTHER SCUDSBROTHER is offline
Flemington
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: L.A.
Posts: 11,326
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Danzig View Post
just moving this forward. i didn't get an answer from anyone on why the feds, mexico, or anyone else should be up in arms about this law. it wasn't a rhetorical question-i really want to know why this is a bad law, or misinformed, etc.
See this:

Stipulates that a law enforcement official or agency cannot solely consider race, color or national origin when implementing these provisions, except as permitted by the U.S. or Arizona Constitution.


Now, how do you make sure that cops will follow this part? .
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04-24-2010, 12:07 AM
joeydb's Avatar
joeydb joeydb is offline
Santa Anita
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Southeastern PA
Posts: 3,044
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ateamstupid View Post
It is misguided you fugging idiot. People like you cry about the gov't "taking over your lives," but now you think it's cool for the cops to knock on doors and interrogate people looking for immigrants.

And keep shouting about November, as if the Republicans are going to get major gains running on platforms of no ideas and less ideas.
My aren't you an eloquent one? You got that vocabulary in college I assume?

The key word here is ILLEGAL. They are breaking the law, and somebody has to enforce the law. If the feds won't do it, the states will. What does the federal government think, that Arizona for example can just keep affording to pay for all the strain on their infrastructure from the illegals, who do not pay income taxes and use the emergency room like their own personal physician?

Get ready for a big old Red Tsunami coming your way. The people who work and pay taxes have had enough of this garbage.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 04-24-2010, 12:49 AM
ateamstupid's Avatar
ateamstupid ateamstupid is offline
Super Mod.. and Super Fly
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 13,036
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by joeydb View Post
My aren't you an eloquent one? You got that vocabulary in college I assume?

The key word here is ILLEGAL. They are breaking the law, and somebody has to enforce the law. If the feds won't do it, the states will. What does the federal government think, that Arizona for example can just keep affording to pay for all the strain on their infrastructure from the illegals, who do not pay income taxes and use the emergency room like their own personal physician?

Get ready for a big old Red Tsunami coming your way. The people who work and pay taxes have had enough of this garbage.
Way to not address my point. Have that paranoia checked out.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 04-24-2010, 12:55 AM
joeydb's Avatar
joeydb joeydb is offline
Santa Anita
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Southeastern PA
Posts: 3,044
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ateamstupid View Post
Way to not address my point. Have that paranoia checked out.
Who's the paranoid one here? -- you have the cops knocking on doors to look for illegal aliens -- like that's really going to happen. The way I took the reports was that they will be able to ascertain the legal status of people in traffic stops or who are arrested for other things.

Right now, the cops have to turn a blind eye to legal status and that has to be remedied precisely because the feds will not enforce the law. If the feds did a good job at preventing illegal border crossings, this would be a non-issue.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 04-24-2010, 06:56 AM
Nascar1966 Nascar1966 is offline
Fairgrounds
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,626
Default

An illegal is an illegal no matter how you look at it. They have no business in this country and becoming a taxpayer's burden. At least some one is trying to do something about it. I comment the Governor of Arizona for not waiting around and taking matters into his own hands.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 04-24-2010, 06:57 AM
herkhorse's Avatar
herkhorse herkhorse is offline
Flemington
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Gonesville
Posts: 11,422
Default

commend
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 04-24-2010, 05:07 PM
timmgirvan's Avatar
timmgirvan timmgirvan is offline
Havre de Grace
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Powder Springs Ga
Posts: 5,780
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by herkhorse View Post
commend
and it's she
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 04-30-2010, 04:36 PM
letswastemoney's Avatar
letswastemoney letswastemoney is offline
The Curragh
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Turlock, CA
Posts: 2,561
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nascar1966 View Post
An illegal is an illegal no matter how you look at it. They have no business in this country and becoming a taxpayer's burden. At least some one is trying to do something about it. I comment the Governor of Arizona for not waiting around and taking matters into his own hands.
I'd probably disagree with you on almost any other issue but,

I actually agree with you on this.

I don't necessarily think it's a bad thing that Mexicans want to come here, but there should be a legal procedure if we want to make it easier on them. Everyone in this country, whether visiting or here for a longer stay, should be properly documented!
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 05-01-2010, 06:09 AM
Nascar1966 Nascar1966 is offline
Fairgrounds
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,626
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by letswastemoney View Post
I'd probably disagree with you on almost any other issue but,

I actually agree with you on this.

I don't necessarily think it's a bad thing that Mexicans want to come here, but there should be a legal procedure if we want to make it easier on them. Everyone in this country, whether visiting or here for a longer stay, should be properly documented!
I also agree with you as long as a non USA citizen has the proper documentation they are more than welcomed to come here.

Last edited by Nascar1966 : 05-02-2010 at 02:48 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 04-24-2010, 06:57 AM
Nascar1966 Nascar1966 is offline
Fairgrounds
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,626
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by joeydb View Post
My aren't you an eloquent one? You got that vocabulary in college I assume?

The key word here is ILLEGAL. They are breaking the law, and somebody has to enforce the law. If the feds won't do it, the states will. What does the federal government think, that Arizona for example can just keep affording to pay for all the strain on their infrastructure from the illegals, who do not pay income taxes and use the emergency room like their own personal physician?

Get ready for a big old Red Tsunami coming your way. The people who work and pay taxes have had enough of this garbage.
I will gladly 2nd your statement. The illegals have no business here period. Like you said they pay no taxes and they are getting free medical care while the American public struggles to have proper health care.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.