![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
The winner of the 1st was given a lifetime top in career start 24. It was 6 points higher than any in his last 10. The winner of the 3rd was given a 61 after recording 54, 65, 67 his last three, 54 most recent. The winner of the 4th was given a 57 after running seven straight races between 53 and 64. The winner of the 5th was given a 75 after running his career high, a 74, in his previous race. This was start number 17. The winner of the 9th was given a 92 after his last 3 of 51, 82, 89. He did come off a layoff and had some nice 100+ back numbers. The runner up will get an 88, a lifetime top in career start number 19. Again, all used the same variant, including the Illinois Derby. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
So, in victory, he was lengths slower than in five of his last 6 races. The 54 was when well beaten on a sloppy sealed track. Everyone else in that field also went backwards. Some severly. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
It seems like 1 point was shaved off of the ILL Derby... and since it was longer than those other races and involved more running into head-wind .. shouldn't it be the other way if any? |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Drugs, we can do this all day.
First, you ignored the 1st race. The third, the horse was dropping from two poor races at 10k to 4k. He is in the hands of a very poor trainer after being claimed 3 back. If you want to believe he ran back to his good races, good luck. The 4th was a brutal pace for those cheap fillies. Of course they are going to run slower. It was 20 points faster than the speed figure. In the fifth, it could be possible the horse improved a little more, but did you look at the horses behind him? Also, the pace was about 8 points faster than the final time, and since the winner actually led from the 1/2 call home, the 75 is probably a little better than it looks. Giving him even higher would be unrealistic. I agree the 9th is the toughest to judge. I think the runner up is the best horse to judge for the figure. He was given a lifetime top, basically a pair up, in his 19th career start while being beaten pretty easily. As for the general "a lot of beaten horses made big backwards moves"...all I can say is no sh!t, that is why they were beaten. I realize the horses had a headwind coming home, but even after adjusting for this the paces of the routes were honest to fast. By far the slowest was the Illinios Derby in relation to final time. This causes lots of horses to move backwards when they are beaten. R1: Fast 11 R3: Fast 3 R4: Fast 20 R5: Fast 8 R7: Slow 6 R9: Fast 8 |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|