|
|
 |
|
#7
10-29-2009, 09:45 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Three questions
1. Why does the headline read "drug violation" when there was in fact no drug? 2. Why did it take this long to adjudicate the case considering there was no court and Mullins apparently had no legal defense? 3. Why didn't they suspend him for a much longer period of time or even indefinitely since there was no state commissions involved and he clearly had intent to break the rules? 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Threaded Mode