Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Sports Bar & Grill
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-08-2009, 10:30 AM
Smooth Operator's Avatar
Smooth Operator Smooth Operator is offline
Gulfstream Park
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,169
Default

Also a big Agassi fan

By the way, pretty sure Andre said that he felt Fed was better than Pete. That opinion is good enough for me. Believe Fed whipped a somewhat diminished Sampras on the court too.

The only case that can be made for Pete now that Fed has the career slam is that, in general, he probably had to face tougher competition.

Borg was clearly a great clay and grass-courter, but Mac and Jimmy exposed him in NY.

Gotta read some more about Laver, but the fact that he won the calendar slam twice is super impressive as it's clearly one of the most difficult things to achieve in all of sports.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-08-2009, 02:06 PM
Gander Gander is offline
Del Mar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,336
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Smooth Operator
Also a big Agassi fan

By the way, pretty sure Andre said that he felt Fed was better than Pete. That opinion is good enough for me. Believe Fed whipped a somewhat diminished Sampras on the court too.

The only case that can be made for Pete now that Fed has the career slam is that, in general, he probably had to face tougher competition.

Borg was clearly a great clay and grass-courter, but Mac and Jimmy exposed him in NY.

Gotta read some more about Laver, but the fact that he won the calendar slam twice is super impressive as it's clearly one of the most difficult things to achieve in all of sports.
The competition thing is always speculative. Not saying I dont agree with it, because in Pete's case, I do. But Nadal is every bit the player that anybody Pete had to play. I would compare him with Agassi. Djokovich is no slouch either, on his best day he can be compared with a Courier...I wouldnt go as far as putting Djokovich with Edberg or Becker but hes not bad.

Roger has a lot of creampuffs he routinely beats like Roddick, Blake, Soderling, etc...but then again so did Pete.

At the end of the day I just dont see how a case can possibly be made for Sampras over Federer. Even if Federer stopped playing today, and thats not going to happen. Realistically, Federer will have 6-8 more majors than Pete by the time this is over and is a much, much better player on clay. Not even close.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.