![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
who is the filly that Zenyatta was drubbing all year long last year that won at Belmont? Intangaroo |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Are we talking about horses who ran on dirt first, and then didn't run well on synthetic? That's the case for many of the examples people have mentioned above. Ginger Punch, Indian Blessing, etc...
I think the point of the thread was to list horses who were strictly synthetic horses as they started their career, and then improved dramatically when switched to dirt. Not to list dirt horses who didn't care for synthetics. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
didnt he set a world record on synth? |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Bob Black Jack was beaten 32 lengths in the Derby in his only dirt start.
More a matter of distance probably. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Lawyer Ron lost a pair of maiden claiming races on synethetic and exploded on the dirt to a dominant MSW win at 7/1.
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Thanks all. Basically I'm trying to look into charecteristics or common traits amongst horses who struggled on synthetics but improved in noteworthy fashion to dirt. Do they have a visual trait common amongst them? Or.... etc.
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
My starting point is the most INTEGRAL, IMPORTANT, and IMPOSING concept in the history of horse racing: THE BOUNCE. My data shows that those horses that never BOUNCE in their racing career are those most apt to run on ANY surface. Of course, once they bounce, this all goes out the window. There's the 'common trait'. |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Acoma broke her Mdn at Keeneland and then won 2 straight at CD, one that included the Dogwood Stks.
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
I beklieve that move up was on an off track?
|
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|