![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
--Independent, standardized third-party testing and monitoring of track surfaces;
You already have this. It is called trainers and riders. They dont listen to us, why pay someone not to listen to them? --“Supertesting” of all winning horses for more than 100 performance-enhancing drugs; Knock yourself out CDI!!! --Age restrictions requiring Thoroughbreds to be at least 24 calendar months of age before becoming eligible to race; Total waste of time, absolutely strict for PR --The freezing and storage of equine blood and urine samples to allow for retrospective testing; Since CD doesnt test the samples, how exactly are they going to store the smaples for further testing and who is going to do the testing? --The banning of steroids; Already done by the state. --Limits on the number of horses allowed to compete in certain races; Based upon the last 2 meets at CD, not exactly an issue --The prohibition of “milkshaking”, which results in excessive levels of total carbon dioxide in Thoroughbred racehorses; They dont already prohibit milshakes? --Prohibiting the transport of horses from CDI facilities for slaughter; Not much of an issue for tracks like CD, plenty of steps down the ladder till they get DF'ed --The banning of unsafe horseshoes, including front shoe toe grabs longer than two millimeters; Ridiculous --The use of low-impact riding whips with limited usage rules; I would love to see the "limited usage rules" --The presence of on-site medical personnel, equipment, and state-of-the-art equine ambulances; They already have this --Immediate online access to jockey medical histories for emergency medical personnel; This would seem to be the jockeys problem. CD cant legally demand access to medical records can they? --$1 million in catastrophic injury insurance coverage for jockeys; Why not --Mandatory and uniform reporting of equine injuries to the Equine Injury Database System, thereby assisting in the compilation of statistics and trends to improve safety conditions around the country; Dont see how this can be enforced. I will not turn over any information on any of my horses injuries unless the names are withheld and the owners give me permission to do so. --A professionally designed and installed safety rail on the inside of the dirt course; They already have this --Mandatory usage by all jockeys, exercise riders and other on-track personnel of safety vests and safety helmets that meet internationally acknowledged quality standards; This rule is like 20 years old --3/8-inch foam padding on all parts of the starting gates; They already have this --Significant financial support for equine retirement programs; define signifigant --Inspection of all horses by regulatory veterinarians prior to and following all races; This is already done --Review of security procedures around barns and other racetrack backstretch areas; The topnotch security squad they have in place needs review? --Continued maintenance of protocols for the treatment of horses that have been injured during racing or training, to ensure the most humane treatment possible; and What exactly does this mean? --Mandatory, independent, and complete necropsies of any horse that dies as a result of an injury sustained while racing or training at Churchill Downs. So does this mean I cant do my own necropsies? |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|