Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Main Forum > The Paddock
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

View Poll Results: What percentage of trainers are using drugs to move up or hold back horses?
0-5% 8 15.38%
6-10% 5 9.62%
11-15% 6 11.54%
16-20% 3 5.77%
21-30% 12 23.08%
31-50% 9 17.31%
51-75% 4 7.69%
76-100% 5 9.62%
Voters: 52. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-03-2009, 04:55 PM
alysheba4 alysheba4 is offline
Randwyck
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,424
Default

i hope horses i wager on are trained by trainers that try harder
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-03-2009, 08:37 PM
cowgirlintexas's Avatar
cowgirlintexas cowgirlintexas is offline
Santa Anita
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Mortyville, USA
Posts: 3,077
Default

I'm wondering who the 8 people are that voted for the 0-5% range
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-04-2009, 03:38 AM
magic_idol's Avatar
magic_idol magic_idol is offline
Randwyck
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Free the Sheeple
Posts: 1,392
Default

^
Me
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-04-2009, 08:34 AM
Cannon Shell's Avatar
Cannon Shell Cannon Shell is offline
Sha Tin
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 20,855
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cowgirlintexas
I'm wondering who the 8 people are that voted for the 0-5% range
Probably the most informed voters
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-04-2009, 09:29 AM
ELA ELA is offline
Randwyck
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: NY/NJ
Posts: 1,293
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
Probably the most informed voters
Informed about what Chuck?

I wanted to ask what actually constitutes "cheating"? If cheating is "breaking the rules" or "not abiding by the rules" -- how can we talk about this when most people don't know the rules? Exercise in futility. I say the % of trainers "not abiding by the rules" is very high, but again, that statement is being made in the abstract.

If we are talking about what % of horses are racing on hay, water and oats -- then that % is going to be extremely low. In the big picture, it might be de minimis. However, hay, water and oats is not the standard. What about raceday medications? Aren't there some jurisdictions where "nothing" can be used on raceday? Aren't there some where you can treat a horse with any # of X listed medications?

Eric
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-04-2009, 07:14 PM
Cannon Shell's Avatar
Cannon Shell Cannon Shell is offline
Sha Tin
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 20,855
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ELA
Informed about what Chuck?

I wanted to ask what actually constitutes "cheating"? If cheating is "breaking the rules" or "not abiding by the rules" -- how can we talk about this when most people don't know the rules? Exercise in futility. I say the % of trainers "not abiding by the rules" is very high, but again, that statement is being made in the abstract.

If we are talking about what % of horses are racing on hay, water and oats -- then that % is going to be extremely low. In the big picture, it might be de minimis. However, hay, water and oats is not the standard. What about raceday medications? Aren't there some jurisdictions where "nothing" can be used on raceday? Aren't there some where you can treat a horse with any # of X listed medications?

Eric
If you are racing with allowable levels of legal medication how are you cheating? Since when is hay, oats and water the only "non-cheating" level?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-04-2009, 07:31 PM
ELA ELA is offline
Randwyck
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: NY/NJ
Posts: 1,293
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
If you are racing with allowable levels of legal medication how are you cheating? Since when is hay, oats and water the only "non-cheating" level?
Chuck, that's my point. It's very simple. The results people see are dictating the opinion. First, if the standard is allowable levels of medication, that's great. However, second, with most people not understanding the rules, and knowing enough about that side of the game, few positive tests dictate that most people will believe that a very small % of trainers "cheat" so to speak. As a side note -- as I've said numerous times, this is also not just about trainers. It's about far more people on the food chain, but we don't have to open that discussion again.

Also, about the hay, oats and water -- I very clearly said that was not the standard. So, are you telling me that the % of trainers who race exclusively with allowable medications is extremely low?

The real problem is that people who want to play the game the right way -- they are often at a competitive disadvantage. It's a shame.

Eric
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-04-2009, 07:38 PM
Cannon Shell's Avatar
Cannon Shell Cannon Shell is offline
Sha Tin
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 20,855
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ELA

Also, about the hay, oats and water -- I very clearly said that was not the standard. So, are you telling me that the % of trainers who race exclusively with allowable medications is extremely low?

The real problem is that people who want to play the game the right way -- they are often at a competitive disadvantage. It's a shame.

Eric
The % of trainers that race exclusively with allowable meds is very high.
The competitive disadvantage is caused by a select few that dont feel that those rules apply to them and understand that the authorities in charge of stopping them are sadly inept.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-04-2009, 06:30 PM
The Indomitable DrugS's Avatar
The Indomitable DrugS The Indomitable DrugS is offline
Flemington
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 11,007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
Probably the most informed voters
I would have disagreed with you ...

But when I saw that Magic Idol is one of the eight ... I feel a lot more like you have to be right.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-04-2009, 07:11 PM
Coach Pants
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Indomitable DrugS
I would have disagreed with you ...

But when I saw that Magic Idol is one of the eight ... I feel a lot more like you have to be right.
You're a mod now?
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 02-04-2009, 07:20 PM
The Indomitable DrugS's Avatar
The Indomitable DrugS The Indomitable DrugS is offline
Flemington
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 11,007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Coach Pants
You're a mod now?
No
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.