Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Main Forum > The Paddock
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-24-2006, 09:19 AM
Scav Scav is offline
Saratoga
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Northwest of The Chi
Posts: 16,012
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by oracle80
So you figure that Beyer is accurate huh? I highly doubt that Court Folly moved that far forward as compared to his most recent races. I also highly doubt that beating Too Much Bling gets you a one point slower number than losing to Court Folly. Its kind of far fetched. Unless you discount the fact that Court Folly was a complete nothing prior to his latest race. Which I simply cannot do.
Songster was on the track this morning. I didn't really see what he did though. I don't know if he breezed or if he just galloped.
I am talking about his TG number
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-24-2006, 09:24 AM
oracle80
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scav
I am talking about his TG number
The only knock I have with any sheet numbers, and have always had, is that when there is a dead rail and you are wide like both of the top two finishers in the Amsterdam, you get credit for being wide when it is in fact a positive. Means you get credit for being wide even though it was indeed the place to be. The inverse is that if you are on a dead rail you don't get any path credit points even though you took the worst of it.
I would caution anyone betting the lats part of this meet and the early part of Belmont Fall to consult with charts and write down the days up here when the rail was no good and inside speed horses were compromised, you better have a lot of ink your pen because their were so damn many. And a few days where the bias was split because of rain that fell during the card or the inverse, when the track started wet and finished dry.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-24-2006, 09:27 AM
Scav Scav is offline
Saratoga
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Northwest of The Chi
Posts: 16,012
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by oracle80
The only knock I have with any sheet numbers, and have always had, is that when there is a dead rail and you are wide like both of the top two finishers in the Amsterdam, you get credit for being wide when it is in fact a positive. Means you get credit for being wide even though it was indeed the place to be. The inverse is that if you are on a dead rail you don't get any path credit points even though you took the worst of it.
I would caution anyone betting the lats part of this meet and the early part of Belmont Fall to consult with charts and write down the days up here when the rail was no good and inside speed horses were compromised, you better have a lot of ink your pen because their were so damn many. And a few days where the bias was split because of rain that fell during the card or the inverse, when the track started wet and finished dry.
This I agree with but TG is usually pretty dead on when the rail is dead, ESPECIALLY in NY, at least in my experience
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-24-2006, 09:29 AM
oracle80
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scav
This I agree with but TG is usually pretty dead on when the rail is dead, ESPECIALLY in NY, at least in my experience
Whatever you say chief, all I know is that a horse who couldnt win allowance races beat a horse who beat Too Much Bling(who returned to another 500 grander in his next race). If you truly believe that Court Folly improved that much with no regression from the other horse, well good luck. So you must love Court Folly on Saturday then right? To at least get a piece of it?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-24-2006, 09:31 AM
Scav Scav is offline
Saratoga
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Northwest of The Chi
Posts: 16,012
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by oracle80
Whatever you say chief, all I know is that a horse who couldnt win allowance races beat a horse who beat Too Much Bling(who returned to another 500 grander in his next race). If you truly believe that Court Folly improved that much with no regression from the other horse, well good luck. So you must love Court Folly on Saturday then right? To at least get a piece of it?
Not at all, I am singling HH on every ticket and dropping close to a tuiton bill on him to win
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-24-2006, 09:36 AM
oracle80
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scav
Not at all, I am singling HH on every ticket and dropping close to a tuiton bill on him to win
WIthout even knowing how the track is playing? Chance of rain on Friday night into Saturday. Track could be ANYTHING. Better keep an open mind when capping that card to the possibility of different track conditions.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-24-2006, 09:38 AM
Scav Scav is offline
Saratoga
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Northwest of The Chi
Posts: 16,012
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by oracle80
WIthout even knowing how the track is playing? Chance of rain on Friday night into Saturday. Track could be ANYTHING. Better keep an open mind when capping that card to the possibility of different track conditions.
An earthquake, along with a tornado and hurricane like conditions could be going on AT THE SAME TIME, and HH would still win the race by 3 lengths
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-24-2006, 09:42 AM
zippyneedsawin's Avatar
zippyneedsawin zippyneedsawin is offline
Oaklawn
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,064
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scav
Not at all, I am singling HH on every ticket and dropping close to a tuiton bill on him to win

Scavs.. how much do you think the HH/Bernadini double will pay?
__________________
Alcohol, the cause and solution to all of life's problems. -Homer Simpson
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.