|
|
 |
|
#21
10-20-2008, 10:47 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Was the question ever posed to the stewards as to what their decision to take the horse down was based on?
__________________
"I don't need nice horses at Philly, just ones with conditions."---Cannon Shell 
|
|
#22
10-20-2008, 11:37 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I watched this race on Calracing at first and thought it seemed ridiculous.
I then watched it on the NJbets site and got the steward views and thought that while it was still a bad DQ, there at least was a modicum of justification for it. Their reasoning happened at the 3/8ths pole. She 'might' have drifted in about an eighth of an inch or so, which caused the horse on her immediate inside to drift in a bit more and that caused the rail horse to take up violently. Stormy but Valid's DQ at SA a number of years ago remains the lamest DQ I've seen.
|
|
#23
10-20-2008, 02:19 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
"I don't need nice horses at Philly, just ones with conditions."---Cannon Shell
|
|
#24
10-20-2008, 02:34 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Felix Unger talking to Oscar Madison: "Your horse could finish third by 20 lengths and they still pay you? And you have been losing money for all these years?!"
|
|
#25
10-20-2008, 02:49 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
you learn something new everyday... thanks for the info
__________________
"I don't need nice horses at Philly, just ones with conditions."---Cannon Shell
|
|
#26
10-20-2008, 05:11 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
njbets has probably the best replay service available. at least of the ones i've seen or used.
every single track!
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
