|
|
 |
|
|
|
#1
10-18-2008, 08:31 AM
|
||||
|
||||
The stewards in NJ have a major hard on for Lezcano. His agent is one of my best friends and he has told me some incredible stories of things they have said to him.
|
|
#2
10-18-2008, 08:53 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Is this agent the stepbrother to the cousins uncle's 3rd ex-wife next door neighbor that works in The White House??
|
|
#3
10-18-2008, 09:01 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#5
10-18-2008, 09:14 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#6
10-18-2008, 10:36 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
At dinner tonight the topic of Allumeuse came up. She was the filly who was DQ'ed at SAR about 20 years ago in a complete error. She was literally no place near the incident and stewards lost their jobs over it.
That was the first thing I thought of last night when that filly came down.
__________________
RIP Monroe.
|
|
#7
10-20-2008, 10:47 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Was the question ever posed to the stewards as to what their decision to take the horse down was based on?
__________________
"I don't need nice horses at Philly, just ones with conditions."---Cannon Shell 
|
|
#8
10-20-2008, 11:37 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I watched this race on Calracing at first and thought it seemed ridiculous.
I then watched it on the NJbets site and got the steward views and thought that while it was still a bad DQ, there at least was a modicum of justification for it. Their reasoning happened at the 3/8ths pole. She 'might' have drifted in about an eighth of an inch or so, which caused the horse on her immediate inside to drift in a bit more and that caused the rail horse to take up violently. Stormy but Valid's DQ at SA a number of years ago remains the lamest DQ I've seen.
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
