9/12: BEL C/O ($608k Friday!!)

[blackthroatedwind]

Originally Posted by docicu3

You are more fun than PG1985........how do you come up with this nonsense?

This may be the single stupidest comment I have ever seen on this board. The guy started a thread the other day about a horse at Laurel that paid $10 and consistently adds intelligent analysis to this board.

He's also right that considering the likely odds on this horse that he's a good bet against.

[hoovesupsideyourhead]

10 bucks sweet

[ateamstupid]

I think it's far from 'nonsense' to call Dr. Decter a bet against. He obviously can win, but is an almost certain underlay.

[kenny p]

Say what you want about the Fat Man but he can break down a race. Hes posted some nice winners on this board. Keep up the good work Fat Man. KP

[hoovesupsideyourhead]

Originally Posted by ateamstupid

I think it's far from 'nonsense' to call Dr. Decter a bet against. He obviously can win, but is an almost certain underlay.

we are talking about a pick 6 no..getting legs..in

[CSC]

Originally Posted by ateamstupid

I think it's far from 'nonsense' to call Dr. Decter a bet against. He obviously can win, but is an almost certain underlay.

I remember him well from betting him in his Spa debut at 8-1, a questionable ride and inexperience were the only things that kept him from winning that race, saying that I can understand people not being on him at 8/5. Still I would never call him a bet against.

[blackthroatedwind]

Originally Posted by CSC

I remember him well from betting him in his Spa debut at 8-1, a questionable ride and inexperience were the only things that kept him from winning that race, saying that I can understand people not being on him at 8/5. Still I would never call him a bet against.

What was questionable about the ride? He broke slowly and moved up into perfect position. What exactly should the rider have done differently?

[ateamstupid]

I'm pretty sure he wasn't 8-1 in his debut either.

[blackthroatedwind]

Originally Posted by ateamstupid

I'm pretty sure he wasn't 8-1 in his debut either.

He was.

[GPK]

It's official....after today I really don't like Channing Hill.

[CSC]

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind

What was questionable about the ride? He broke slowly and moved up into perfect position. What exactly should the rider have done differently?

I saw it a little differently, I thought Coa moved a little early on the horse. Perhaps if the horse was much the best it would have been not mattered. But he probably is just an "ok" type.

[blackthroatedwind]

Originally Posted by CSC

I saw it a little differently, I thought Coa moved a little early on the horse. Perhaps if the horse was much the best it would have been not mattered. But he probably is just an "ok" type.

I don't know if he necessarily " moved early " in as much as he sort of had no choice after being squeezed out after the start. The only real chance he probably had was to get into the race. His trip obviously compromised him but IMO it's an unfair oversimplification to claim it was jockey error. He was more a victim of circumstance.

[docicu3]

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind

This may be the single stupidest comment I have ever seen on this board. The guy started a thread the other day about a horse at Laurel that paid $10 and consistently adds intelligent analysis to this board.

He's also right that considering the likely odds on this horse that he's a good bet against.

Andy please.....just once let the guy make his own argument. For multi race wagering, which this thread is about,tossing that horse is just stupid for the reasons listed. You want to marry the guy be my guest. It's legal now in most states but the number of times you rush in as "the expert" to defend this guy is ridiculous. We get it. Your in love with the Fatman and his opinions but when you start making statements like Rice's entry in the 6th is not even the 7th most likely winner of the 6th tomorrow, with the turf sprint success she has had, it is easy to see why you had the kind of losing Saratoga meet you had. You look great on camera but weren't very good at the windows this summer now were you. You want to tell people to toss "A" selections in multi's be my guest.

Since when does a 4-1 shot at Laurel get you so excited. I give out a 15-1 ML that ends up 9-2 and your all pouty about payoff. Your main squeeze gives out Scott Lake in Maryland and you want to treat it like a BC P6.....Please.

[blackthroatedwind]

Originally Posted by docicu3

Andy please.....just once let the guy make his own argument. For multi race wagering, which this thread is about,tossing that horse is just stupid for the reasons listed. You want to marry the guy be my guest. It's legal now in most states but the number of times you rush in as "the expert" to defend this guy is ridiculous. We get it. Your in love with the Fatman and his opinions but when you start making statements like Rice's entry in the 6th is not even the 7th most likely winner of the 6th tomorrow, with the turf sprint success she has had, it is easy to see why you had the kind of losing Saratoga meet you had. You look great on camera but weren't very good at the windows this summer now were you. You want to tell people to toss "A" selections in multi's be my guest.

Since when does a 4-1 shot at Laurel get you so excited. I give out a 15-1 ML that ends up 9-2 and your all pouty about payoff. Your main squeeze gives out Scott Lake in Maryland and you want to treat it like a BC P6.....Please.

I'm now even less sorry I rejected your advances and went to the Fat Man instead.

I hope somehow you can get past that and get on with your life.

[docicu3]

Originally Posted by Coach Pants

damn thats funny!!

[the_fat_man]

See, this is all my fault. Instead of slapping the DOUCHE on ignore (and making him go away except when others QUOTE HIM) when he started acting up after his 7:2 winner, I should've invited Stevie Belmont (king of the long winded post winner celebrations) over from that other forum and had a special awards ceremony. I mean, it's not everyday that someone gives out a 7:2 shot. When was that again?

And I do apologize for picking against the short priced obvious trouble horse.

ha ha ha

[hoovesupsideyourhead]

Originally Posted by the_fat_man

See, this is all my fault. Instead of slapping the DOUCHE on ignore (and making him go away except when others QUOTE HIM) when he started acting up after his 7:2 winner, I should've invited Stevie Belmont (king of the long winded post winner celebrations) over from that other forum and had a special awards ceremony. I mean, it's not everyday that someone gives out a 7:2 shot. When was that again?

And I do apologize for picking against the short priced obvious trouble horse.

ha ha ha

you could join him..at that other forum..possible king of the you dont see what i see gifted.....

[ryonker]

I'll "bat leadoff" and throw down the 1st set of picks-

2,5,7/2,10/1,11/1,6,7,8/7,10/1,7,10,11,12 =$960
8,9/2,10/1,3,11/1,6,7,8/7/1,7,10,11,12 =$480
2,5,7/1/1,11/1,6,7,8/7/1,7,10,11,12 =$240
2,5,7,8/2,10/3/1,6,7,8/7/1,7,10,11,12 =$320

total=$2000

thanks
Ron

[docicu3]

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind

Wow!

You know what that was quite enough and I apologize I just have had enough of Fatman and you defending the guy. I was out of line and I apologize....I am making it worse.

See I got my just desserts....Papplebon just blue a save to go into first!!!....Damn it..something I actually care about