Pacific Classic

Originally Posted by Gander

Okay maybe so. But still you cant diminish a horse like the Tin Man because of a running style, which by the way is a brilliant one. He never has poor trip excuses when he loses like the others. Its comical, he actually has an excuse why he won a million dollar race, and people talk about the fact that the jockeys gave him this race over the fact that the horse has tremendous ability.

Tim he is a nice horse but you are fooling yourself and not us. The fact is that Live Life(who actually held 3rd in the Beverly D!!!!) went exactly 20 lengths faster than the Tin man. Your argument holds no water. Envisoon The Tin Man TWENTY lengths behind Live Life. There is no way to even begin to express just how slow the pace was. The minute the 3/4 time was up on the board there wasn't any way it was going to be anything but those two horses in that order. Horses that talented who are allowed to go that slow will never chuck it. Hes a great horse, he was before the Million and is now, but you really can't say that the race proved anything except that the connections on cacique and English Channel were extremely arrogant and igonred the Tin Man's ability. However if you feel so strongly that he is better than those two horses I will be happy to bet you straight up if they meet again that both horses beat the Tin man. be happy to give you that proposal, very happy. They got fooled once, they won't get fooled the next time.

[Gander]

Never said he was better Mike, this is my exact quote.

I did not and still do not think the Tin Man is better or worse than English Channel or Cacique. I think they are all pretty close and pace and luck determines which horse wins on any given time they meet. Its as simple as that.

But to bet English Channel to win at 2/1 versus the Tin Man at 5/1 considering the post positions is pretty absurd. English Channel is a nice horse but there is simply way too much to guess at in turf racing.

Originally Posted by Gander

Never said he was better Mike, this is my exact quote.

I did not and still do not think the Tin Man is better or worse than English Channel or Cacique. I think they are all pretty close and pace and luck determines which horse wins on any given time they meet. Its as simple as that.

But to bet English Channel to win at 2/1 versus the Tin Man at 5/1 considering the post positions is pretty absurd. English Channel is a nice horse but there is simply way too much to guess at in turf racing.

Like I said, if there is a rematch and you wanna go heads up against either lemme know. hes a very good horse who got very lucky.

[somerfrost]

Originally Posted by oracle80

Like I said, if there is a rematch and you wanna go heads up against either lemme know. hes a very good horse who got very lucky.

This looked like an European type pace...only I don't recall so many of those so-called great turf horses coming home as fast as the Tin Man. I agree with Oracle that the slow pace doomed anyone behind The Tin Man but his final quarter was still pretty damn amazing and I think it's grossly unfair to say a claimer could have won even with that pace...again, 22 and change for the final quarter equates to "real racehorse" talent regardless of the early fractions. Obviously the course was playing fast, but saw what you will, The Tin Man demonstrated that he continues to be a threat in any race...although I suspect he'll see more rabbits from here on out than could be produced by Bugs Bunny attending a three day orgy!

[Gander]

Let me ask again, how Ramzutti could be used as the sacrificial lamb for English Channel when they are owned by 2 different people?

Why would the owner care to help out English Channel on Oct 7th?

Originally Posted by Gander

Let me ask again, how Ramzutti could be used as the sacrificial lamb for English Channel when they are owned by 2 different people?

Why would the owner care to help out English Channel on Oct 7th?

I am sure all parties involved have a deal worked out amongst the three of them.

[Dunbar]

Originally Posted by oracle80

However if you feel so strongly that he is better than those two horses I will be happy to bet you straight up if they meet again that both horses beat the Tin man. be happy to give you that proposal, very happy. They got fooled once, they won't get fooled the next time.

IMO, that would be a very poor bet on your part, oracle. It's as if you are ignoring the Dubai race and the rest of TTM's resume since he came back. I would take that proposition even with a sacrificial rabbit in the race. For that matter, I would have taken the Tin Man side of that proposition even before the Arlington Million.

I'm not saying he is clearly better than either EC or Cacique. (Though I suspect he is every bit as good as either) But I would definitely take him to finish ahead of at least one of them if all 3 meet in the BC Turf or other upcoming race.

--Dunbar