bad day at CD

[SilverRP]

So a horse has something wrong with him. Connections drop him, race him, he breaks down, and nothing will be done??

[Cannon Shell]

Originally Posted by SilverRP

So a horse has something wrong with him. Connections drop him, race him, he breaks down, and nothing will be done??

Proving that something was wrong is the problem. The horse passed the pre race exam. If you can prove that a horse was injured prior to the race then you may have a point.

[Bigsmc]

Originally Posted by SilverRP

So a horse has something wrong with him. Connections drop him, race him, he breaks down, and nothing will be done??

What horse doesn't have something wrong with him/her? Every one of them has something wrong, some to a greater degree than others.

[10 pnt move up]

This is why its a big deal that racing better at least due its best to address, rather then the usual ignore and people will forget about it manor in which they seem to handle other issues.

The scroll on ESPN under the horse tab and on ESPN news was "two horses euthanized after breaking down at Churchill downs today" it gave the specifics as well but dont remember. Then it says "Sailors Cap wins 600k Colonial Turf Cup".

ESPN and all shows/sites care about ratings, they track that Big Brown loses the Belmont story and it gets 500k hits, then the story about Larry Jones having a drugged horse and it gets 750k....well you know where there coverage goes.

The congress can take up tons of important issues but if its something the public does not really care about then they will certainly bring up something that tugs at peoples emotions and this clearly does, and especially during an election year.

If horses keep breaking down on national TV and racing just has "panels" to discuss it, as they do with say the NTRA players panel and nothing ever happens, then this is going to get worse before it gets better. Just ask Barry Bonds and baseball how it worked out for them just trying to ignore the problem for decades.

[Cannon Shell]

Originally Posted by 10 pnt move up

This is why its a big deal that racing better at least due its best to address, rather then the usual ignore and people will forget about it manor in which they seem to handle other issues.

The scroll on ESPN under the horse tab and on ESPN news was "two horses euthanized after breaking down at Churchill downs today" it gave the specifics as well but dont remember. Then it says "Sailors Cap wins 600k Colonial Turf Cup".

ESPN and all shows/sites care about ratings, they track that Big Brown loses the Belmont story and it gets 500k hits, then the story about Larry Jones having a drugged horse and it gets 750k....well you know where there coverage goes.

The congress can take up tons of important issues but if its something the public does not really care about then they will certainly bring up something that tugs at peoples emotions and this clearly does, and especially during an election year.

If horses keep breaking down on national TV and racing just has "panels" to discuss it, as they do with say the NTRA players panel and nothing ever happens, then this is going to get worse before it gets better. Just ask Barry Bonds and baseball how it worked out for them just trying to ignore the problem for decades.

If you think that there is a solution to horses breaking down, I would love to hear it.

[10 pnt move up]

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell

If you think that there is a solution to horses breaking down, I would love to hear it.

Certainly there is nothing that can completely eliminate the problem, but we could start with drug free race day medications. We all know horses are running when they should not be. Another thing that needs to be done is racing meets need to be scaled back and the yearly number of races run need to be reduced, so when horses are not running because they are in pain they are not forced to run to fill races. race tracks need to support these bans but a reason they put up with drugs is they need all these races to fill and if a little pain killer is needed I don't think they care as long as the races fill.

I think tracks is some states were allowed to get harder and harder, such as California, and in the long run led to training race horses for quarter horse speed which is not a good thing if you have to run more then four hundred yards.

I think trainers should be punished like they are in Hong Kong for drug violations.

I think its ridiculous that horses are hit 30 times down the stretch, its legal now but that does not make it right.

I think the breeding industry is a sham right now, its a meat market mentality that starts when they look at the pedigree match ups right through the two year old sales. I could go on and on.

[Cannon Shell]

Originally Posted by 10 pnt move up

Certainly there is nothing that can completely eliminate the problem, but we could start with drug free race day medications. We all know horses are running when they should not be. Another thing that needs to be done is racing meets need to be scaled back and the yearly number of races run need to be reduced, so when horses are not running because they are in pain they are not forced to run to fill races. race tracks need to support these bans but a reason they put up with drugs is they need all these races to fill and if a little pain killer is needed I don't think they care as long as the races fill.

I think tracks is some states were allowed to get harder and harder, such as California, and in the long run led to training race horses for quarter horse speed which is not a good thing if you have to run more then four hundred yards.

I think trainers should be punished like they are in Hong Kong for drug violations.

I think its ridiculous that horses are hit 30 times down the stretch, its legal now but that does not make it right.

I think the breeding industry is a sham right now, its a meat market mentality that starts when they look at the pedigree match ups right through the two year old sales. I could go on and on.

I think that you like a lot of other people have some reasonable ideas yet you assume a lot and dont take into consideration many things.

There is no legal raceday medication that would have any bearing on horses breaking down. Nice sentiment but pretty much not a factor in horses breaking down,.

You say "we all know horses are running when they arent supposed to be". I say how do you know except in an after the fact, monday morning quarterbacking way? How do you determine what is ok and what isnt? That is a question that trainers ask themselves each day and let me tell you there is no simple solution because as Bigs said before, virtually no horse is 100% everytime. A lot of times horses with chronic issues are the safest ones to run because they seemingly know their limitations and the ones that seem completely sound are the ones that overextend and breakdown.

The idea that scaling back racing schedules will lower the % of breakdowns is interesting yet probably not valid. Less races makes less oportunities to make money which leads to increased pressure to make the spots that are available.

The training of horses has changed but not because of the speed of the tracks. The training of young horses has changed dramatically because owners dont allow horses to race themselves into shape and they reward trainers whose horses come out running first time out. Look at a guy like Nick Zito and how he has changed his training methods with babies. He used to almost always give them a race first time out which is the way he learned from the trainers in the 60's. But a few years ago he started cranking them up like everybody else because he was losing owners to guys that won with firsters. When established guys like Zito have to change successful training methods in order to keep owners and get horses, you can see that the trend has become the rule. Guys like Charlie Whittingham (for those who arent familiar, he was pretty good) almost never won first time and really didnt even want to, prefering to get horses experience before taking on more advanced rivals. Horses are running as much as they were in the 60's except many of the races are run for no purse in the morning. But since horses are investment tools in many cases there is pressure to not run until they are 99% ready to run their best and then they have to run well as to not diminish "value". Personally I would be very content in giving my horses a race or 2 as two year olds before really cranking them down but the market simply doesnt allow that anymore. Another thing that a trainer has to be concerned with is win % and losing too many prep races is bad for the old percentage.

I would love to have rules like Hong Kong but only if we had a setup like they have with laws that back up the rules. If we had one training track, 2 days of races a week for 9 months out of the year and purses that averaged $130000 per race with high tech security and vets that worked for the association no problem. until we do their systemm wont work here.

Exactly what would you do to make the breeding industry not a sham?

All these ideas are interesting but i have yet to see anything that would serve any direct ability to prevent breakdowns.

[10 pnt move up]

" I say how do you know except in an after the fact"

First hand knowledge, at the time I was young and just thought that's what everyone does. To be fair none of those horses who were given medicines for pain ever broke down.


"The idea that scaling back racing schedules will lower the % of breakdowns is interesting yet probably not valid. Less races makes less opportunities to make money which leads to increased pressure to make the spots that are available."

yes this is a bit theory but I know, again first hand knowledge, that trainers have entered horses in California to fill for the secretary with full knowledge they were not ready to run.

"The training of horses has changed but not because of the speed of the tracks. The training of young horses has changed dramatically because owners don't allow horses to race themselves into shape and they reward trainers whose horses come out running first time out"

absolutely zero disagreement there, its a win first mentality perpetuated by the media and breeding industry.

"I would love to have rules like Hong Kong but only if we had a setup like they have with laws that back up the rules. If we had one training track, 2 days of races a week for 9 months out of the year and purses that averaged $130000 per race with high tech security and vets that worked for the association no problem. until we do their system wont work here."

So we should let trainers who bend the rules skate because we don't have the same purse structure? I say the model we have is broken. There are to many tracks, to many races, the wagering dollar is stretched to thin, yet purses have to go up to make it work for the owners and the trainers to make money. That's broken. But we can just keep raising take out, I am willing to bet Ky is on its way up now that NY just raised there to obscene levels.

"Exactly what would you do to make the breeding industry not a sham"

To start the cosmetic surgeries should not be allowed. Medications should not be allowed for these two year old in training sales. Maybe stallion restrictions should be considered. Maybe horses should not be inbred like they have been.

I hate the status quo. This will sound sadistic but I want the whole thing to blow up because its broken. From ADW's, to breeding, to regulation, to product, etc etc...its broken.

[Pedigree Ann]

Originally Posted by 10 pnt move up

C
I think the breeding industry is a sham right now, its a meat market mentality that starts when they look at the pedigree match ups right through the two year old sales. I could go on and on.

How about marketing 'free range' yearlings? The typical sales yearling isn't allowed to run and play to build up dense, tough bone; they are stalled and hand-walked so that they don't collect dents and dings that put off buyers. Of course, then they would look lean and fit and like the gawky adolenscents that they are, rather than fat, sleek near-adult-looking animals. Can't have that, you know.

[freddymo]

Originally Posted by Pedigree Ann

How about marketing 'free range' yearlings? The typical sales yearling isn't allowed to run and play to build up dense, tough bone; they are stalled and hand-walked so that they don't collect dents and dings that put off buyers. Of course, then they would look lean and fit and like the gawky adolenscents that they are, rather than fat, sleek near-adult-looking animals. Can't have that, you know.

This is so true on so many different scales..

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell

If you think that there is a solution to horses breaking down, I would love to hear it.

The first thing they should do is not allow horses to race under medication. In countries like Germany it is not even possible to stand a stallion which has raced under medication even 1x.

If you need medication to race you shouldn't race. Right now very unsound horses can compete at all levels because they have medications to mask the pain.

Then you get unsound horses just producing more unsound horses.

Vindication was unsound and I assume he will produce plenty of unsound horses.

[blackthroatedwind]

Originally Posted by Americanus

The first thing they should do is not allow horses to race under medication. In countries like Germany it is not even possible to stand a stallion which has raced under medication even 1x.

If you need medication to race you shouldn't race. Right now very unsound horses can compete at all levels because they have medications to mask the pain.

Then you get unsound horses just producing more unsound horses.

Vindication was unsound and I assume he will produce plenty of unsound horses.

I'm just curious, I see you have named yourself for a horse currently racing in NY......do you think he should be allowed to race?

[10 pnt move up]

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind

I'm just curious, I see you have named yourself for a horse currently racing in NY......do you think he should be allowed to race?

man that is funny

[Cannon Shell]

Originally Posted by Americanus

The first thing they should do is not allow horses to race under medication. In countries like Germany it is not even possible to stand a stallion which has raced under medication even 1x.

If you need medication to race you shouldn't race. Right now very unsound horses can compete at all levels because they have medications to mask the pain.

Then you get unsound horses just producing more unsound horses.

Vindication was unsound and I assume he will produce plenty of unsound horses.

So there are no breakdowns in germany?

"Very unsound horses can compete at all levels because of medication?"
This is not true.

"Unsound horses " is not a catagory of horses. If you fall down and break your arm should you not be able to reproduce because you are unsound?
This type of thinking is not only stupid, is it totally without merit.