$5.50 for this?

[NoLuvForPletch]

Originally Posted by DaHoss9698

Honestly, it's pretty easy to determine if a race is 1 turn or 2. It's not like replays are hard to obtain for a lot of tracks. It almost sounds like you want everyone to do the work for you. There is a sizeable advantage in this game for players who put the time into handicapping, watching races, etc. The DRF in my opinion is a good start. It's up to us all how much other handicapping we want to do.

Personally, I know which is which but I don't think it is that easy honestly. 1 mile races can be tricky and you need to know which tracks have a 1 mile chute and which ones don't. But what is it some kind of exclusive club? That's like saying, you should know which racetracks are Polytrack and which are Dirt and if you don't too bad? Do you also object to that information being in the PP's?

[slotdirt]

I'd pay $5.50 to get this thread to stop.

[TheSpyder]

I have some old forms from the 80's and if you look at them they appear blank. There's so much more information in today's form than previously someone from back then would be shocked at the details now included and consider it a bargin. BY the way, I too am 1000 miles from anywhere to buy a form and do everything on line anyway.

Personally though, I prefer Brisnet, but that's me.

Spyder

[hoovesupsideyourhead]

in 2096 the replays will be in holographic form with every drf..though the cost will be about 550.bucks in euros...

[geeker2]

Tax Big Oil and subsidize DRF

[SentToStud]

Originally Posted by hoovesupsideyourhead

in 2096 the replays will be in holographic form with every drf..though the cost will be about 550.bucks in euros...

[NoLuvForPletch]

Originally Posted by DaHoss9698

You obviously don't, because you said so earlier. It's not a club. But isn't there some kind of responsibility on YOU, you know the one actually betting. The DRF can only show so much. You seem angry they aren't showing you more. How about a little good old fashioned work? In terms of not knowing which tracks are and aren't synthetic, if you follow the sport and wager your money and do not know by now which tracks are or aren't, please, bet more.

Seriously, you guys are amazing. Remember when Andy had his "time off" because posting here was more work than it was worth. Well, people like you are the reason. Where in ANY of my posts did I ever say I didn't know? I may have said that I thought the 1 mile races were actually 1 mi and 70 yrds on the Inner at AQU, but I never said I didn't know which races were 1 or 2 turns. Read the posts before becoming all elitest. I said it would be a welcome addition to the PP's. Seriously, what would be the harm. This way I wouldn't have to explain it to whomever I am with that day that doesn't spend 5-6 days a week watching horseracing. You pick out one freaking thing people say a harp on it to no end. How about the other points? CLOSER LOOK is f'in lame...argue that...They can't even put in the pertinant Trainer stats consistantly...argue that...is there harm in putting the m/l in the actual PP's? What the hell are peoples problem on this board. Mr "I know every track configuration in the country, you should too" DaHoss, doesn't like one thing I say and I'm a slacker...Get real people...