![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
The horses he rode always seemed to gut out the win in close races??? I can think of few weaker jocks in that department. He was notorious in the 80s for waiting too long! Ferdinand beating Alysheba in the classic is a nice example off the top of my head. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() First of all is Vic Stauffer the true Vic Stauffer here?
Secondly haven't we decided that jockies are overrated anyway? Thirdly while Mccarron was hardly a slug of a Jockey, he did happen to give one of the worst rides in Preakness history on Touch Gold, though TG did stumble at the break, it was a nightmarish trip beyond belief or certainly of a jockey of Mccarron's stature. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
however, there really were far too many times mccarron waited and waited and waited. his ride on sheba in the belmont was very typical of his thinking. i'm not saying sheba would have beaten bet twice that day, but taking him that far back in a race where speed rules (despite the distance) was typical of his poor tactical thinking. sheba was a much faster horse than generally recognized (by fast i mean he had very nice tactical speed) and if he had been more forwardly placed, the race could easily have come out differently. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
My point being, as you know already, that had he been used more intelligently in the race, he'd have gotten second instead of fourth, and there is no doubt he'd have finished much closer to Bet Twice than he did. Last edited by Indian Charlie : 03-27-2008 at 06:40 PM. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|