PokerStars

[AeWingnut]

Originally Posted by Scav

Seat 1: ericsheikh (3,095)
Seat 2: Metallos (7,306)
Seat 3: scavsiu8 (5,865)
Seat 4: AmeerH (3,182)
Seat 5: CarrDogg (3,740)
Seat 6: corover1967 (6,370)
Seat 7: Pampooso (1,560)
Seat 8: sandston (435)
Seat 9: KyleFly (1,952)
KyleFly posts the small blind of 50
ericsheikh posts the big blind of 100
The button is in seat #7
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to scavsiu8 [7s 7c]
Metallos folds
scavsiu8 raises to 465
AmeerH folds
scarrs (Observer): i hate pocket 10
CarrDogg calls 465
corover1967 calls 465
Pampooso folds
KyleFly folds
ericsheikh folds
*** FLOP *** [7h 6c 5h]
scavsiu8 checks
CarrDogg bets 1,545
corover1967 has 15 seconds left to act
corover1967 raises to 5,905, and is all in
scavsiu8 calls 5,400, and is all in
CarrDogg calls 1,730, and is all in
corover1967 shows [Ac 9c]
scavsiu8 shows [7s 7c]
CarrDogg shows [Ts Td]
Uncalled bet of 505 returned to corover1967
*** TURN *** [7h 6c 5h] [2c]
*** RIVER *** [7h 6c 5h 2c] [4c]
corover1967 shows a flush, Ace high
scavsiu8 shows three of a kind, Sevens
corover1967 wins the side pot (4,250) with a flush, Ace high
CarrDogg shows a pair of Tens
corover1967 wins the main pot (11,370) with a flush, Ace high
CarrDogg stands up
scavsiu8 stands up
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot 15,620 Main pot 11,370. Side pot 4,250. | Rake 0
Board: [7h 6c 5h 2c 4c]
Seat 1: ericsheikh (big blind) folded before the Flop
Seat 2: Metallos didn't bet (folded)
Seat 3: scavsiu8 showed [7s 7c] and lost with three of a kind, Sevens
Seat 4: AmeerH didn't bet (folded)
Seat 5: CarrDogg showed [Ts Td] and lost with a pair of Tens
Seat 6: corover1967 showed [Ac 9c] and won (15,620) with a flush, Ace high
Seat 7: Pampooso (button) didn't bet (folded)
Seat 8: sandston is sitting out
Seat 9: KyleFly (small blind) folded before the Flop

well obviously you need to re-evaluate your play.
ALL IN needing runner runner and gets it. That just Sux doesn't seem appropiate. Is he an idiot that has all the chips or do you think the program has been cracked?

[Scav]

Originally Posted by AeWingnut

well obviously you need to re-evaluate your play.
ALL IN needing runner runner and gets it. That just Sux doesn't seem appropiate. Is he an idiot that has all the chips or do you think the program has been cracked?

I don't know. He might have been an extremely weak player that was trying to bluff and got slow rolled by me. As I was telling a friend last night, in real life, that play is never made by that guy, but because it is online and an extremely low level of online play, **** like that happens

[AeWingnut]

Originally Posted by Scav

I don't know. He might have been an extremely weak player that was trying to bluff and got slow rolled by me. As I was telling a friend last night, in real life, that play is never made by that guy, but because it is online and an extremely low level of online play, **** like that happens

yes it does happen but it also happens at a higher level of play. I decided I couldn't beat people who are either bad or know the program. Good luck

May the suckout be with you

[hi_im_god]

Originally Posted by AeWingnut

well obviously you need to re-evaluate your play.
ALL IN needing runner runner and gets it. That just Sux doesn't seem appropiate. Is he an idiot that has all the chips or do you think the program has been cracked?

i'm out.

i can't change anyone's faith nor would i want to.

and that's what this thread wound up being about. you either believe there is a on-line poker business model built on the inevitability of profits raking a high traffic site or you are conspiracy guy.

and i'll stop banging my head against the wall arguing with conspiracy guy.

we're even btw.

[NoChanceToDance]

Just read through the thread, I miust say I find the thoughts interesting. I've started to play online poker (both for money and for fun) over the last few months.

One thing I have noticed on many of the sites is that the people who bet most hands usually keep getting nice cards. As if the site is saying, the more hands you play the better your cards will get.

Of course, this could be luck, but I've seen it so many times. I played a tournament last week and this one guy must have bet at least 75% of the hands. He never lost the chip lead.

On betfair poker, me and a few friends have commented that whoever has the chip lead after usually continues to get very good cards.

I've been done with a set of Kings on the river. I had pocket kings and put in a fair size bet pre flop. I had two takers. Flop came out 7K2, I was over the moon with that flop, made a substantial bet, first player folded and the next raised me all in. I thought for a while..... I was like "well, he can't be in front" I expected him to have pocket 7s or pocket 2's. I call. Cards come down, he has A7....... so i'm like "wtf".... turn comes down ACE..... hmmmm, I was busy thinking about chances of an ace on the river..... river card also an ACE!! full house aces over sevens beating my set of kings.

This guy either had no clue what he was doing or knew he would get paid off in the end. It was like he was the one with the big hand at the flop.

I've been beaten after betting flops going all in with others on the same website where they have needed both cards to make a flush or stragitht.It has happened three or four times now.

It's a bit more than lucky for their point of view.