![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Sweet! Another way for me to lose my money chasing an impossible jackpot.
Only 95,040 combinations in a 12 horse field.
__________________
please use generalizations and non-truths when arguing your side, thank you |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Isn't this the same approach that Shick and Gilette have taken with razor blades,
![]() |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
$1 minimum on a 5 ecta???!?!?! Yet the super is only a dime??? lololol
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I like the Hammer, but he is out of his mind with this idea. Add a midrange Pk4 or something if you have to add an exotic I got a 1 meet shelf life on this exotics, tops |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Recently I saw a discussion on another board about a ten cent pick-6 and there was a suggestion to separate the pool into two segments.
What if that idea was applied here. A bettor would have the option of playing a .10 or $1 wager on the race.All monies wagered would be divided 90% to anyone holding a $1 ticket and 10% to the .10 winners. If no one holds a $1 ticket the money carries over to the next day. Hollywood's superfecta pools are around $175,000 and I would guess they would be cut down 25% by the additional wager. Assuming 50k was in the first day's pool roughly $4,000 would pay out to the .10 winners and $36,000 for a $1. Any thoughts? |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|