Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Main Forum > The Paddock
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-25-2007, 12:54 PM
blackthroatedwind blackthroatedwind is offline
Jerome Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 9,938
Default

It's really not about being left wing, Chuck, it's just about doing a shoddy job of reporting. The most left wing person I have ever known has been disgusted with their reporting ( and very much favors the WSJ ) for many years.

However, as you said, they aren't looking for a response. They are very simply dramatically misstating facts and butchering the interpretation of this story. This editorial is a woefully incompetent rendering of the situation. However, no NYC paper has made any attempt to understand anything about the current racing situation, and the reporting has reflected that.

One other thing.....by the logic of the author of this article, every bar in NY should also be closed, as surely many more rent dollars are spent there and many more lives are also wasted and ruined by alcohol. Who knew the NY Times was an advocate of bringing back Prohibition. It is, however, good to know.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-25-2007, 01:22 PM
Cannon Shell's Avatar
Cannon Shell Cannon Shell is offline
Sha Tin
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 20,855
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind
It's really not about being left wing, Chuck, it's just about doing a shoddy job of reporting. The most left wing person I have ever known has been disgusted with their reporting ( and very much favors the WSJ ) for many years.

However, as you said, they aren't looking for a response. They are very simply dramatically misstating facts and butchering the interpretation of this story. This editorial is a woefully incompetent rendering of the situation. However, no NYC paper has made any attempt to understand anything about the current racing situation, and the reporting has reflected that.

One other thing.....by the logic of the author of this article, every bar in NY should also be closed, as surely many more rent dollars are spent there and many more lives are also wasted and ruined by alcohol. Who knew the NY Times was an advocate of bringing back Prohibition. It is, however, good to know.
Isn't the morality of gambling argument a little stale in 2007 considering state of our society?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-25-2007, 01:42 PM
geeker2's Avatar
geeker2 geeker2 is offline
Hialeah Park
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: San Diego
Posts: 6,235
Default

When you see things like this in print..it always makes me wonder..... if they got this all wrong ...what else are they printing that is wrong...

Maybe Elvis is still alive.....and living in Chuck's barn.
__________________
We've Gone Delirious
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-25-2007, 02:34 PM
blackthroatedwind blackthroatedwind is offline
Jerome Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 9,938
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
Isn't the morality of gambling argument a little stale in 2007 considering state of our society?

Well of course.

But, with the lottery doing so much, for so many, it's a wonder gambling ( and really all vices ) aren't promoted even more.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-25-2007, 03:21 PM
pick4's Avatar
pick4 pick4 is offline
Aqueduct
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 645
Default

The editorial writers of the Times were not the only ones who fail to fully understand this issue.

The Daily News has their say: http://www.nydailynews.com/opinions/...int=1&page=all

as does the New York Post:

http://www.nypost.com/seven/11162007...ase_118440.htm
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-25-2007, 03:29 PM
blackthroatedwind blackthroatedwind is offline
Jerome Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 9,938
Default

Compared to the Times piece those responses are pure genius. At least they understand the situation a bit better.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-25-2007, 05:13 PM
freddymo freddymo is offline
Belmont Park
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 7,091
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind
Compared to the Times piece those responses are pure genius. At least they understand the situation a bit better.
Have you ever heard of "Letter to the Editor"? I am guessing this maybe a vehicle for an intelligent response?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-25-2007, 06:11 PM
GenuineRisk's Avatar
GenuineRisk GenuineRisk is offline
Atlantic City Race Course
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 4,986
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind
Compared to the Times piece those responses are pure genius. At least they understand the situation a bit better.
And pointed the finger a bit more at Albany- again, because I don't fully understand the situation- that is where the majority of the money goes, correct?

(And Arljim, I too find it pretty hypocritical that states that run lotteries wring their hands about gambling. Or churches that run bingo nights. For that matter, what else is the stock market, really?)
__________________
Gentlemen! We're burning daylight! Riders up! -Bill Murray
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-25-2007, 07:11 PM
pick4's Avatar
pick4 pick4 is offline
Aqueduct
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 645
Default

If one good thing could come out of these editorials it would be that OTB situation is addressed once and for all. The Spitzer/NYRA agreement left the status quo in place and it's clearly obvious that is a failed business model.


GenuineRisk: As far as the finger pointing towards Albany, Steve Crist of the DRF explains how NYCOTB lead by political hack Ray (Rudy Giuliani's cousin) Casey made the mistake of agreeing to make extra payments to NYS in exchange for the right to take bets for throughbred races at night.
http://cristblog.drf.com/crist/2007/...ering-our.html

The NYCOTB and the five other statewide OTB's have a 6% surcharge on winning wagers. Yet NYCOTB considers this a surcharge an expense as stated in Matt Hegarty's article two weeks ago: http://www.drf.com/drfNewsArticle.do...5&subs=0&arc=1.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-25-2007, 04:14 PM
Cannon Shell's Avatar
Cannon Shell Cannon Shell is offline
Sha Tin
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 20,855
Default

I always about the 'dwindling' interest in a venture where 1 billion dollars a years is bet on it through one outlet. I guess the media is so conditioned to call horseracing a 'dying' sport that they never stop to think about the billions of dollars of revenue derived from this venture. Of course it would take the newspapers to step out of their ivory towers to see that the horse racing business has a whole lot better chance of being in existence in 20 years than the print media business does.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 11-25-2007, 03:41 PM
ArlJim78 ArlJim78 is offline
Newmarket
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
Isn't the morality of gambling argument a little stale in 2007 considering state of our society?
uh yeah, especially when casinos, lotteries and poker are celebrated as mainstays of society.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.