Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Main Forum > Equine Health, Retirement & Aftercare
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-13-2007, 10:58 AM
Kasept's Avatar
Kasept Kasept is online now
Steve Byk
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Greenwich, NY
Posts: 44,147
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stonegossard
So you think trainers milkshaking horses isnt a big deal? The guy's outfit CHEATED. It's bs like this that is killing the game. 120 days was light....regardless of if he knew, he should have gotten a hell of a lot more than 4 mos. It's a total cop out that these guys say "I was on vacation...I wasnt there". They are responsible for the guys who work under them. If not they could drug the hell outta horses and play the dumb/I didnt know card if they got caught all the time.
The argument that Sciacca and Barone have had was that the horse in question was not the horse that they were cited for working on. Gary never argued that the situation wasn't his responsibility.
__________________
All ambitions are lawful except those which climb upward on the miseries or credulities of mankind. ~ Joseph Conrad
A long habit of not thinking a thing wrong, gives it a superficial appearance of being right. ~ Thomas Paine
Don't let anyone tell you that your dreams can't come true. They are only afraid that theirs won't and yours will. ~ Robert Evans
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command. ~ George Orwell, 1984.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-13-2007, 11:25 AM
wigmore wigmore is offline
Sam Houston
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 24
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kasept
The argument that Sciacca and Barone have had was that the horse in question was not the horse that they were cited for working on. Gary never argued that the situation wasn't his responsibility.
Still they were Milkshaking a horse right?

They were caught right?

And they are still wortking for Sciacca 4 years later. What does that say about Sciacca?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-13-2007, 11:32 AM
Riot's Avatar
Riot Riot is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 14,153
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wigmore
Still they were Milkshaking a horse right?

They were caught right?

And they are still wortking for Sciacca 4 years later. What does that say about Sciacca?
The barn maintained publically at the time that the horse that was to receive the tubed electrolytes was a horse that had raced the previous day. That's not an uncommon practice to replace electrolytes in a horse that needs them post-race.
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-13-2007, 11:51 AM
Scav Scav is offline
Saratoga
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Northwest of The Chi
Posts: 16,012
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wigmore
Still they were Milkshaking a horse right?

They were caught right?

And they are still wortking for Sciacca 4 years later. What does that say about Sciacca?
Did you just not read that horses are 'hosed' sometimes to help with colic or worms or shipping.

From what I gather, Sciacca fought that the horse that was being 'shaked' was not the horse that was RUNNING.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-13-2007, 12:00 PM
wigmore wigmore is offline
Sam Houston
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 24
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scav
Did you just not read that horses are 'hosed' sometimes to help with colic or worms or shipping.

From what I gather, Sciacca fought that the horse that was being 'shaked' was not the horse that was RUNNING.
Surely if the horses was being legitimately treated then it would be easy to prove right?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-13-2007, 12:06 PM
Scav Scav is offline
Saratoga
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Northwest of The Chi
Posts: 16,012
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wigmore
Surely if the horses was being legitimately treated then it would be easy to prove right?
I have no idea, I am learning all this now, but for someone to fight this for FOUR YEARS, and to have many holes in the story according to someone that is CLOSE to the situation, someone I trust, I'll go with that instead of what the media has to say.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-13-2007, 12:26 PM
wigmore wigmore is offline
Sam Houston
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 24
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scav
I have no idea, I am learning all this now, but for someone to fight this for FOUR YEARS, and to have many holes in the story according to someone that is CLOSE to the situation, someone I trust, I'll go with that instead of what the media has to say.
fought for 4 years and lost..

and had the suspensions increased as well...

Honestly now, if this was some other trainer with no connection to this board would you be defending him or would you be with me in being just a little bit suspiciuos
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-13-2007, 12:08 PM
blackthroatedwind blackthroatedwind is offline
Jerome Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 9,938
Default

I'm just amazed. I really am surprised to read horseplayers defending cheating that is routinely stealing, yes stealing, money from our pockets.

The naivite around here is really surprising.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-13-2007, 12:11 PM
Scav Scav is offline
Saratoga
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Northwest of The Chi
Posts: 16,012
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind
I'm just amazed. I really am surprised to read horseplayers defending cheating that is routinely stealing, yes stealing, money from our pockets.

The naivite around here is really surprising.
I don't disagree with you, but I am trusting in what Byk has to say about it in an earlier post how the story changed multiple times, this and that.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-13-2007, 12:14 PM
blackthroatedwind blackthroatedwind is offline
Jerome Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 9,938
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scav
I don't disagree with you, but I am trusting in what Byk has to say about it in an earlier post how the story changed multiple times, this and that.
Byk is good friends with Gary.

Byk is as loyal and as good a friend as someone can have.

That's admirable.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 11-13-2007, 12:23 PM
Riot's Avatar
Riot Riot is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 14,153
Default

Quote:
The naivite around here is really surprising
I would like to see any of the horseplayers around here readily name the top three or four drugs or concoctions trainers can use to cheat, and then say what effect those drugs would have on horses racing with that illegal help, and then tell me what jurisdictions do not or cannot test for those drugs.
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-13-2007, 12:29 PM
blackthroatedwind blackthroatedwind is offline
Jerome Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 9,938
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Riot
I would like to see any of the horseplayers around here readily name the top three or four drugs or concoctions trainers can use to cheat, and then say what effect those drugs would have on horses racing with that illegal help, and then tell me what jurisdictions do not or cannot test for those drugs.
Why is it incumbant upon us to know what kinds of things people do to cheat us out of our money?
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-13-2007, 12:33 PM
paisjpq's Avatar
paisjpq paisjpq is offline
top predator.
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 5,020
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Riot
I would like to see any of the horseplayers around here readily name the top three or four drugs or concoctions trainers can use to cheat, and then say what effect those drugs would have on horses racing with that illegal help, and then tell me what jurisdictions do not or cannot test for those drugs.

what would this have to do with the current discussion?

being able to name banned substances and who tests for what doesn't change the FACT that Gary was found guilty of milkshaking....whether he did it or not should not even be up for discussion.....if the trainer in question was Durtrow who here would defend him?

the naivitee that andy refers to implys that some posters here, including perhaps the host of the board are blindly assuming that because the guy says he didn't do it (since he is friend of the "team")then he didn't....obviously those investigating this issue felt otherwise...hence the guilty finding. I happen to like Gary personally...but I still think he did it.
__________________
Seek respect, not attention.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-13-2007, 02:40 PM
Sightseek's Avatar
Sightseek Sightseek is offline
Flemington
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 11,024
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind
I'm just amazed. I really am surprised to read horseplayers defending cheating that is routinely stealing, yes stealing, money from our pockets.

The naivite around here is really surprising.
Perhaps I'm becoming extremely jaded, but it's really very amazing what we, as fans and/or handicappers, put up with in regards to the entire 'sport'.

Are there even enough benefits to be gained from milkshaking to even risk being caught? Seems pretty stupid to me.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 11-13-2007, 03:06 PM
blackthroatedwind blackthroatedwind is offline
Jerome Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 9,938
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sightseek

Are there even enough benefits to be gained from milkshaking to even risk being caught? Seems pretty stupid to me.

Don't forget, when this incident took place very few people were being caught for milkshaking, as testing only began in the last two years.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 11-13-2007, 12:09 PM
Riot's Avatar
Riot Riot is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 14,153
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wigmore
Surely if the horses was being legitimately treated then it would be easy to prove right?
That apparently is the controversy ... was the horse seen being tubed by the undercover agent the horse that was racing that day, or was it another horse (the horse that raced the previous day) and the agent mixed up what stall/horse he saw tubed.

BTW, the horse in question (the horse racing that day) was not allowed to race that day.
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.