Chicago writer should get fired for this article

[kentuckyrosesinmay]

[quote=paisjpq]

Originally Posted by kentuckyrosesinmay

moodwalker might have meant that you used the incorrect "to" when you sated that the article was 'way to harsh' you meant that the article was 'way too harsh'...just an idea, not passing any judgement as i make typos all the time...it's a message board not an english test

Yeah, but that still wouldn't have come up in spell check. That was a grammar error. I had a lot of grammar errors in that article because I was really fired up when I was posting it. Not to mention, I was also typing incredibly fast because I was mad at the article. One thing that article definitely did was shock and stir emotions, even though it wasn't done in the right manner.

[paisjpq]

i like the way the writer implys that an animal that has been euthanized can then enter the food chain--where does he think that the barbituates go when the animal is put down??? That horse would poison any other animal or person that ate the meat. just another of his inflammatory inconsistancies.

[kentuckyrosesinmay]

This message board is messing up our quotes.

[paisjpq]

yeah it is...

[Scurlogue Champ]

Haha, I don't care about the article. I just found it ironic that you were going to "take him to school" on how he should write, and you had writing errors in the post where you were describing his.

If you are so good, why don't you write an article about the issue and send it on in to the Chicago paper. I'm sure that they will be able to see that you obviously are a more talented scribe.

Why would I try to analyze the article when I didn't really have any problem with it? I never made a mention of not liking it. It is pretty much the standard fare from sports writers.

Also, I have never initiated an "attack" against you. You just are an annoying **** sometimes.