|
|
 |
|
|
|
#1
10-15-2007, 11:25 AM
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
How does this game not wind up 42-10 or something like that? 
|
|
#2
10-15-2007, 11:27 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
16 1/2 now
|
|
#3
10-15-2007, 12:01 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Miami skunked NE at home last year.
|
|
#4
10-15-2007, 12:12 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#5
10-15-2007, 12:22 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Defense stinks. Secondary is awful, no pass rush and Jason Taylor looks 50 years old out there.
|
|
#6
10-16-2007, 06:13 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Moss can have 0 catches and still be the most dominant player on the field if he attracts all the attention he's been getting in the last two games.
The more they double him and constantly role coverages his way the better off all the other players at the skill positions will be. Has anyone seen how deep the safeties have been playing? I know NE has lost their starter and 2nd string RB, but I'm not so sure I couldn't be effective running in that offense. With Moss and Brady healthy, the only way that offense can be stopped is if a defensive line (without the aid of blitzing linebackers) totally dominates NE's offensive line. The way the NE O-line has played, good luck with that. This team will probably break the record for all-time points scored in a season. That record is held by the '98 Vikings, who went 15-1 in Randy Moss's rookie year, when he had 17 TD's while offically starting just 11 games...that before teams figured out all the clever schemes to stop him.
|
|
#7
10-16-2007, 06:32 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
I disagree, the way to stop this offense is with a solid secondary. If you can play up on every reciever but randy(It's possible) and then either drop in a lb underneath or a safety over the top, your going to create easy blitz situations. The pressure will not allow the recievers to get into double moves or field stretching patterns. If you just sit back and play any type of zone or cover two... brady is going to pick you apart. It's just like peyton manning, you don't just rush four and hope someone gets lucky and gets to him. You have to take calculated risks and try to force him into something stupid. They both are simply too smart and too accurate to play any type of zone defense.
__________________
Inveniemus viam aut faciemus
|
|
#8
10-17-2007, 08:21 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#9
10-16-2007, 06:11 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#10
10-16-2007, 07:02 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#11
10-16-2007, 07:18 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
stephen a smith commented on the accusations that the pats ran up the score at dallas. i agreed with what he said. that if dallas just wanted the game over, they shouldn't have called time out with 1 1/2 minutes left for one...more to the point, you don't want the other team to score--don't let them!
also enjoyed his take on the whole popcorn thing. funny stuff.
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all. Abraham Lincoln
|
|
#12
10-16-2007, 07:22 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
cannon goes to the well again...lol
|
|
#13
10-16-2007, 07:49 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
I don't remember writing that you should blitz all the time. I said you had to take calculated risks. Randy moss is a game breaker, dante stallworth is above average but nothing special. I can think of more then a few corners who could take stallworth in man coverage. I can think of zero that could take randy moss. The whole key is to force brady into bad throws. If you don't bring pressure, his mistakes will be few and far between. You have to give him diffrent looks, stunts, twists etc up front. The pats offensive is solid so you cant just hope your front 4 get pressure. Mix it up bring safeties, corners, backers, whatever just keep mixing it up and stay out of some weak gap zone.
__________________
Inveniemus viam aut faciemus
|
|
#14
10-16-2007, 07:52 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
JJP. Welker is a nice reciever but nothing special. I call it the brandon stokely reciever. Put an average reciever with two above average reciever( such as stokely the last few years in indy) and he is going to put up numbers simply because coverages are being rolled to the outside to shut the recievers down.
__________________
Inveniemus viam aut faciemus
|
|
#15
10-16-2007, 07:59 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
You can't be serious about blitzing with safeties.....
|
|
#16
10-16-2007, 07:54 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I don't think they are running up the score at all.
|
|
#17
10-16-2007, 07:58 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#18
10-17-2007, 09:23 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
