Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Main Forum > The Paddock
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-31-2007, 01:49 PM
theiman's Avatar
theiman theiman is offline
Cahokia Downs
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Orange County CA.
Posts: 172
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mrmikegap
When a track decides, or in the case in California been forced to, install a synthetic racing surface, they are faced with the decision to install polytrack, cushion track, or tapeta. What is the difference between all three?
The $$ Amount in the bribe envelope?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-31-2007, 03:31 PM
The Indomitable DrugS's Avatar
The Indomitable DrugS The Indomitable DrugS is offline
Flemington
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 11,007
Default

Accoding to Dickinson, "Tapeta was made for an American climate - as opposed to polytrack, which was made for a European climate."

From what I've seen.....polytrack is complete garbage, cushion track is better than polytrack...and Tapeta might be better than cushion track.

Nothing they make will ever replace the greatness that is the natural dirt surface.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-31-2007, 04:58 PM
NoChanceToDance's Avatar
NoChanceToDance NoChanceToDance is offline
The Curragh
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: I live in a world of mystery
Posts: 2,907
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Indomitable DrugS
Accoding to Dickinson, "Tapeta was made for an American climate - as opposed to polytrack, which was made for a European climate."

From what I've seen.....polytrack is complete garbage, cushion track is better than polytrack...and Tapeta might be better than cushion track.

Nothing they make will ever replace the greatness that is the natural dirt surface.
How many times do i have to say that is the track's fault..... not the surface. If the tracks over there were to maitain it properly, it would be a good surface.

Martin Collins sells it as a "maintenance free" surface, when it is anything but that, but the US tracks seem to have taken his word for it.
__________________
Avatar ~ Nicky Whelan

and now we murderers because we kill time
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-31-2007, 05:28 PM
Diver52
 
Posts: n/a
Default

To look at, Poly and Cushion are quite different. Cushion looks more shredded with bigger pieces while Poly is like a gummy gooey sand. (They had samples of Poly to feel at Del Mar, ick). It is easy to see that horses might not "sink" into Cushion they way they are said to do into dry warm Poly.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-31-2007, 07:36 PM
Cannon Shell's Avatar
Cannon Shell Cannon Shell is offline
Sha Tin
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 20,855
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NoChanceToDance
How many times do i have to say that is the track's fault..... not the surface. If the tracks over there were to maitain it properly, it would be a good surface.
How exactly do you know how the tracks are being maintained here?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-01-2007, 12:04 PM
NoChanceToDance's Avatar
NoChanceToDance NoChanceToDance is offline
The Curragh
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: I live in a world of mystery
Posts: 2,907
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
How exactly do you know how the tracks are being maintained here?
I have seen how they are harrowed, and the amount of water put on some of them.

You do not need to be a brain surgeon to realise that the tracks with Poly in America are doing plenty of things wrong.

It's starting to make me laugh that they obviously have no clue as to how to maitain a synthetic surface, and how the racing fans seem to be very short sighted about the whole thing.
__________________
Avatar ~ Nicky Whelan

and now we murderers because we kill time
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-01-2007, 05:21 PM
Cannon Shell's Avatar
Cannon Shell Cannon Shell is offline
Sha Tin
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 20,855
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NoChanceToDance
I have seen how they are harrowed, and the amount of water put on some of them.

You do not need to be a brain surgeon to realise that the tracks with Poly in America are doing plenty of things wrong.

It's starting to make me laugh that they obviously have no clue as to how to maitain a synthetic surface, and how the racing fans seem to be very short sighted about the whole thing.
You have the ability to watch the harrows and water trucks from Europe?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-01-2007, 05:25 PM
my miss storm cat's Avatar
my miss storm cat my miss storm cat is offline
Saratoga
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 22,025
Default

I don't want to get into this debate as clearly I don't know enough but there was a breakdown in the first race at Presque Isle Downs.....

Rest in peace, Cantrel.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-01-2007, 10:00 PM
Sightseek's Avatar
Sightseek Sightseek is offline
Flemington
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 11,024
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaHoss9698
Huge binoculars, duh.
I laughed.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-01-2007, 09:06 AM
mrmikegap mrmikegap is offline
Les Bois
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 43
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Indomitable DrugS
Accoding to Dickinson, "Tapeta was made for an American climate - as opposed to polytrack, which was made for a European climate."

From what I've seen.....polytrack is complete garbage, cushion track is better than polytrack...and Tapeta might be better than cushion track.

Nothing they make will ever replace the greatness that is the natural dirt surface.

I agree 100%. Natural dirt is the best surface.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.