![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
WOW! That is insane. Does anyone know how the rest of the ticket was structured?
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Not sure.
I know the Breeders Cup Fix 6 winning ticket consisted of four straight singles, followed by two ALL-ALL's. I think it's pretty amusing that someone singled a 65/1 shot in leg one of pick six!...if this is true. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Ateam - certainly does raise some eyebrows. Maybe the person(s) who singled the horse in Leg A had a connection to the horse so they had to single him. It was just a $16 ticket. Either good handicapping or luck or both.
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
I've played this game for the better half of my life and I've never heard of someone singling a 60-1 shot and having it win, much less, having it be one of four straight singles and then hitting the pick 6.
I would like to know the percentages of that happening. Virtually impossible for me to believe. |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
But yeah, just the concept of singling a 65/1 shot in leg 1 of a P6 is virtually unheard of. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Just two cents to think about (at least from my optimistic perspective) is that we're using the 65-1 number as the standard.
If this were a player who placed their pick-6 wager before the pools opened, say a bet from a bettor who wasn't actively wagering on each race and just handicapped it first and placed it -- the morning line odds and the final odds were: 20-1 -- off at 65-1 5-1 -- off at 8-1 3-1 -- off at 2-1 8-1 -- off at 14-1 While the early singling still looks fishy, it doesn't look quite as crazy when you look at the ML odds of the horses. This player didn't necessarily single a 65-1 shot, he or she may have singled what they thought was a 20-1 shot. If that matters.... |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|