![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Cobb's averages over 24 seasons 120 runs 224 hits 39 2bs 16 3bs 6 hrs 103 rbis 48 sbs .366avg .433 obp .512 slg Tris Speakers averages over 22 seasons in the same era 109 runs 204 hits 46 2bs 13 3bs 7hrs 90 rbis 25 sbs .345avg .428 obp .500 slg While Cobb has the better numbers he isn't that far superior to Speaker who was also known as the best fielding outfielder of the turn of the century players. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I just don't see where the Babe was so much more dominant beside the case of smashing homeruns and that was mostly just coming out of the dead-ball era. Rogers Hornsby or Lou Gehrig or George Sisler or were no slouches themselves. Do you know the amount of stat records they both held at their retirements? |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
You do understand that hitting home runs is a much more valuble skill than bunting or stealing bases. When you hit home runs you just trot around the bases and it does not matter what your opponents do. And it seemed that Ruth was the only one coming out of the deadball era when he became a full time outfielder being that he was hitting more HR's than teams and breaking rbi, runs scored, OBP, SLG records |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Yeah, that's why it's so cheap. Bulk up and power your way through. Cobb had power but prefered to play with his head. He also hit 5 homeruns in two days when he decided to actually go for homeruns and that cannot be disputed. Perhaps homeruns are the ultimate play but too me they will always be cheap. A homerun in one park, a fly ball in another. I will definately admit his 1921 season was one for the ages. I do wonder if his skill as a Red Sox player bashing hr's was somewhat responsible for a change in baseballs that took the game out of the deadball era into a lively ball era which it became. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|