Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Main Forum > The Paddock
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-11-2007, 06:35 AM
docicu3 docicu3 is offline
The Curragh
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,778
Default

When I read the original post at the beginning of the thread, which has been deleted now unfortunately, I took your comment to imply that Gomez wasn't exactly riding his horse all out to win because he was upset because he was being kept off Rags.

If you didn't mean that I apologize but it was something I had not considered til then and in retrospect I think it is worth examining for merit.

I certainly do not want to put words in your mouth that you didn't intend to be represented by your thread......I am sorry this worked out this way I meant no malice toward you in any way.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-11-2007, 06:39 AM
golfer's Avatar
golfer golfer is offline
The Curragh
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,608
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by docicu3
When I read the original post at the beginning of the thread, which has been deleted now unfortunately, I took your comment to imply that Gomez wasn't exactly riding his horse all out to win because he was upset because he was being kept off Rags.

If you didn't mean that I apologize but it was something I had not considered til then and in retrospect I think it is worth examining for merit.

I certainly do not want to put words in your mouth that you didn't intend to be represented by your thread......I am sorry this worked out this way I meant no malice toward you in any way.
I understand that now, my first response to you was because I mis-understood. I absolutely think his heart was not in the ride, and did as little as he could to win the race. Where I went too far, was implying that he was trying to help Rags to Riches, which I have no facts to back up. We originally thought the only explanation for his ride was that he was following directions, but Larry Jones has made it perfectly clear that was not correct.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-11-2007, 07:57 AM
Travis Stone's Avatar
Travis Stone Travis Stone is offline
Oaklawn
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 2,229
Default

Sounds like sour grapes to me... Saturday's race proved that Hard Spun is the 4th best 3-year-old through the Triple Crown.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-11-2007, 08:25 AM
The Indomitable DrugS's Avatar
The Indomitable DrugS The Indomitable DrugS is offline
Flemington
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 11,007
Default

Who was the 3rd best horse through the triple crown?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-11-2007, 08:47 AM
The Indomitable DrugS's Avatar
The Indomitable DrugS The Indomitable DrugS is offline
Flemington
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 11,007
Default

I had a feeling no one would want to try and answer that one.

I know I sure wouldn't.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-11-2007, 08:53 AM
Mortimer's Avatar
Mortimer Mortimer is offline
Thistley Downs
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 21,864
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Indomitable DrugS
I had a feeling no one would want to try and answer that one.

I know I sure wouldn't.
I would have to say Hard Spun as I have no fear.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-11-2007, 08:57 AM
The Indomitable DrugS's Avatar
The Indomitable DrugS The Indomitable DrugS is offline
Flemington
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 11,007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mortimerdexterfoxworthy
I would have to say Hard Spun as I have no fear.
That means one of the following three...Curlin, R2R, and SS would have to get a 4th place vote from you. Which is it?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-11-2007, 09:19 AM
Mortimer's Avatar
Mortimer Mortimer is offline
Thistley Downs
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 21,864
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaHoss9698
Sorry DrugS I had to go to work. After the Derby I thought the 3 best horses in the race ran 1-2-3. I wasn't sure in which order I would rank them, but I thought they were the top 3. I thought the same thing after the Preakness. Rags proved Saturday she belongs in the top 3 now, with Hard Spun dropping into 4th.

Me personally, and I will admit I'm a bit biased towards Street Sense would rank Street Sense 1, Curlin 2, Rags 3 and Hard Spun 4. I am in no way trying to diminish what Rags just accomplished, as she is a wonderful filly. She had the worst of it Saturday and beat Curlin straight up. I just think if they get a chance to race again I think Curlin gets her measure, and I think Street Sense is better than both of them. Hard Spun is in danger of losing 4 to either Tiago or The Green Monkey.


What do you say Sporty Fans!!??









I agree.











Crinkle

Trash can
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-11-2007, 09:24 AM
The Indomitable DrugS's Avatar
The Indomitable DrugS The Indomitable DrugS is offline
Flemington
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 11,007
Default

I still don't want to answer my own question....I have no problems posting about sock stories....but I really don't want to hear about some imaginary bias I supposedly have against a certain horse again.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-11-2007, 09:34 AM
Bobby Fischer's Avatar
Bobby Fischer Bobby Fischer is offline
Oaklawn
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,401
Default

Watch the replay from the gate into the first turn.

Gomez turned down the inside and the lead going into the first turn.

He could have rated a slow 50second half on the lead or he could have changed the dynamics of the race and set a 48 half.

Probably 4th best regardless.

Beyond the start and pace decision:
On light viewing Gomez appeared to do a pretty good job of rating Hard Spun. In a quick look, I didn't see obvious signs of the horse fighting the jockey. If that is the case overall it wasn't the worst ride in history. If however Hard Spun never settled into a pace and actually fought Gomez all the way around then yes overall terrible ride.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 06-11-2007, 09:26 AM
The Indomitable DrugS's Avatar
The Indomitable DrugS The Indomitable DrugS is offline
Flemington
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 11,007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaHoss9698
OOOOOOOOOO

Well played. I just gave Sniper your phone number, that's cool right?
Did you?

I sent him directions to his place.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-11-2007, 09:27 AM
Mortimer's Avatar
Mortimer Mortimer is offline
Thistley Downs
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 21,864
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaHoss9698
OOOOOOOOOO

Well played. I just gave Sniper your phone number, that's cool right?

Thank you.




And it's fine.....in fact he just called shreiking at the top of his lungs.

I just kept laughing and saying "doo-dah!"..which made him all the madder.









Oh by the way.













I gave your number to Uncly Trust.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-11-2007, 12:20 PM
LARHAGE's Avatar
LARHAGE LARHAGE is offline
Hawthorne
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 545
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaHoss9698
I agree. So let me get this straight, Pino is taken off for moving too soon. Gomez gets crap for not moving too soon. Can't have it both ways Larry.
You know, maybe a trainer change is what is in need here, he complains that he's not in front of the two horses who finished dead ****ing last setting the pace, than says he should have been the one setting those slow fractions, as if Albarado and Velasquez are going to let Gomez lope along unchallenged. If I were Gomez I would tell Larry to lose 80 pounds and ride the ****ing horse himself!
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 06-11-2007, 12:34 PM
ArlJim78 ArlJim78 is offline
Newmarket
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,549
Default

I have made the comment before that he is a horse that seems to want to run at one speed. He doesn't have a kick and he can't be restrained. Whenever the pace is slow and the jockey tries to restrain him his performance suffers. I don't know who is at fault the trainer or jockey for the way he was ridden in the Belmont, but I would have thought his best hope would have came by letting him run relaxed on the lead like in the derby.

However even letting him run he probably still would have finished fourth, at best maybe challenged for third. At classic distances he is a cut below the top in this crop.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.