Librarians, Keepers of the Liberty

[Downthestretch55]

Originally Posted by ArlJim78

I jokingly call her a triple threat. She's a "maiden" or something close to it (not that there's anything wrong with that), a female, and a black.
Then you add Republican to the mix and it just does not compute.

Seriously though, I really admire her. Hope she survives the Bush presidency without taking too much damage.

I also hope she survives the Bush presidency.
She seems to be very intelligent and articulate.
I hope she does well in her future, though I don't think voters will easily forget the excuses she's made defending the present policies.

Originally Posted by Downthestretch55

I also hope she survives the Bush presidency.
She seems to be very intelligent and articulate.
I hope she does well in her future, though I don't think voters will easily forget the excuses she's made defending the present policies.

Do you mean the policies which have kept all of us safe and secure at our keyboards for the past five years?

Don't think it wasn't noticed that you and your friends never responded to that post.

This thread has been like a chess club room ... a Grand Master taking on a dozen chumps at once ... and beating them all eased up.

Yeah ... that's the ticket ... Bold Brooklynite ... Grand Master of the Off Topic-General Forum ...

... the rest ... nowhere.

[somerfrost]

Originally Posted by Bold Brooklynite

Do you mean the policies which have kept all of us safe and secure at our keyboards for the past five years?

Don't think it wasn't noticed that you and your friends never responded to that post.

This thread has been like a chess club room ... a Grand Master taking on a dozen chumps at once ... and beating them all eased up.

Yeah ... that's the ticket ... Bold Brooklynite ... Grand Master of the Off Topic-General Forum ...

... the rest ... nowhere.

Truly a legend in your own mind...as I believe I said in response somewhere to a post by Scuds...arrogance isn't a bad thing until paired with stupidity! When you've been shown to be a narrow-minded fool and still think you've won the argument, you are beyond help...and a complete waste of time to respond to anymore. Concrete thinking, robotic echolalia...a true credit to the American right! You remind me of the joke about the ant floating downstream on it's back yelling, "raise the drawbridge boys, I got a hard-on!" Sorry to tell you guy, but like that ant, the logic and "evidence" behind your arguments simply doesn't come close!

[Downthestretch55]

Somer,
You just got yourself "post of the week".. LMFAO!!!

Bold B...you just got check-mated.

Originally Posted by somerfrost

Truly a legend in your own mind...as I believe I said in response somewhere to a post by Scuds...arrogance isn't a bad thing until paired with stupidity! When you've been shown to be a narrow-minded fool and still think you've won the argument, you are beyond help...and a complete waste of time to respond to anymore. Concrete thinking, robotic echolalia...a true credit to the American right! You remind me of the joke about the ant floating downstream on it's back yelling, "raise the drawbridge boys, I got a hard-on!" Sorry to tell you guy, but like that ant, the logic and "evidence" behind your arguments simply doesn't come close!

And yet ... and yet ... and yet ...

... you and all your leftist buddies have demonstrated to this entire forum ... that you're completely incapable of directly addressing any of my posts ... or any of my questions ... and/or responding to them ... much less ... much less putting together a cogent thought of your own.

But hey ... that's OK ... 'cause this is a horse racing forum ... and all of you guys are very knowledgable when it comes to the ponies ... and I love and admire you for it.

So stick to the horse racing forums ... because when it comes to this one ... the conclusion is abundantly clear ...

Bold Brooklynite ... Grand Master of the Off Topic-General Forum !!!

[Downthestretch55]

Originally Posted by Bold Brooklynite

And yet ... and yet ... and yet ...

... you and all your leftist buddies have demonstrated to this entire forum ... that you're completely incapable of directly addressing any of my posts ... or any of my questions ... and/or responding to them ... much less ... much less putting together a cogent thought of your own.

But hey ... that's OK ... 'cause this is a horse racing forum ... and all of you guys are very knowledgable when it comes to the ponies ... and I love and admire you for it.

So stick to the horse racing forums ... because when it comes to this one ... the conclusion is abundantly clear ...

Bold Brooklynite ... Grand Master of the Off Topic-General Forum !!!

More LOL Grand Master, twister of words, ducker of questions, poster of insults, and user of Sowell to "put together thoughts" of "your own".


LOL!!!!!!

Originally Posted by Downthestretch55

More LOL Grand Master, twister of words, ducker of questions, poster of insults, and user of Sowell to "put together thoughts" of "your own".


LOL!!!!!!

See ... you figured it out ... you've discovered the four secrets to being a Grand Master.

But ... don't try to do it at home.

[Downthestretch55]

Originally Posted by Bold Brooklynite

See ... you figured it out ... you've discovered the four secrets to being a Grand Master.

But ... don't try to do it at home.

Oh tell me please Grand Master Baiter,
Where do you do it? On the subway, on the bus, in the White House, or in Dixie's ear?

[timmgirvan]

Originally Posted by Downthestretch55

More LOL Grand Master, twister of words, ducker of questions, poster of insults, and user of Sowell to "put together thoughts" of "your own".


LOL!!!!!!

Wayne: you are joined at the hip with that commondreams rag! dont throw any stones.....I still like you....but you're a FLAMER

[Downthestretch55]

Originally Posted by timmgirvan

Wayne: you are joined at the hip with that commondreams rag! dont throw any stones.....I still like you....but you're a FLAMER

Yup Timm,
I like you.
I really am a flamer. Just my way.
btw, I haven't posted a commondreams link in a while...but if you're interested.....

naw...go there and take your pick. Some good ones today.

Originally Posted by Bold Brooklynite

And yet ... and yet ... and yet ...

... you and all your leftist buddies have demonstrated to this entire forum ... that you're completely incapable of directly addressing any of my posts ... or any of my questions ... and/or responding to them ... much less ... much less putting together a cogent thought of your own.

Bold Brooklynite ... Grand Master of the Off Topic-General Forum !!!

Cogent thought of your own? Holy crickies. The guy is joined at the skull with Sowell. And BB only got the neurons attached to lower brain stem functions. Go back to my last post to you and your 50's black family. You completely ignored them. And you should cause there really is no way out.

Originally Posted by pgardn

Cogent thought of your own? Holy crickies. The guy is joined at the skull with Sowell. And BB only got the neurons attached to lower brain stem functions. Go back to my last post to you and your 50's black family. You completely ignored them. And you should cause there really is no way out.

And here's the bottom line ...

All of the leftist arguments have been about process ... not about results. The fact is that all of us have been safe and secure at our keyboards for the past five years ... not because there aren't savages who would gladly murder us all ... but because our armed forces and police forces and intelligence agencies have been doing a terrific job of killing and capturing the terrorists ... and foiling their plots to attack us ... even right now as we view this post.

And who has been overall in charge of this amazingly successful security effort? Who is the one person who would be taking a barrage of hateful invective had there been additional attacks ... but who instead deserves the highest accolades in their absence?

I'll give you a few seconds to come up with the answer. Let's play the "Jeopardy" theme song while you tax your brains to come up with the answer ...

Dern-da-doo ... dern-dern-dern-da-doo ... dern-dern-dern-dern-da-doo-di-da-da ... dern-dern-dern-dern-dern-dern-dern-dern ... doo-di-da-da ...doo-doo-doo.

OK ... let's see what you've come up with.

Somerfrost says ... "Al Gore." Ummm ... no ... sorry ... Al Gore really wasn't elected president ... he was the loser ... that's not correct.

Downthestretch says ... "Kofi Annan." Gee ... sorry ... Kofi is just a corrupt, bumbling, tyrant-loving bureaucrat who'd actually be happy to see us murdered.

Pgardn says ... "Barney Frank." Nope ... also not correct ... Mr. Frank is an outstanding congressman and a very attractive man ... especially when he drools out of the right side of his mouth ... but no that's not correct either.

The correct answer is ... "George W. Bush" ... yes, George W. Bush has been the president of the United States for the past five years ... and has the overall responsibility for securing the safety and freedom of American citizens ... and has fulfilled that responsibility with great success ... George W. Bush is the correct answer.

[Downthestretch55]

Originally Posted by Bold Brooklynite

And here's the bottom line ...

All of the leftist arguments have been about process ... not about results. The fact is that all of us have been safe and secure at our keyboards for the past five years ... not because there aren't savages who would gladly murder us all ... but because our armed forces and police forces and intelligence agencies have been doing a terrific job of killing and capturing the terrorists ... and foiling their plots to attack us ... even right now as we view this post.

And who has been overall in charge of this amazingly successful security effort? Who is the one person who would be taking a barrage of hateful invective had there been additional attacks ... but who instead deserves the highest accolades in their absence?

I'll give you a few seconds to come up with the answer. Let's play the "Jeopardy" theme song while you tax your brains to come up with the answer ...

Dern-da-doo ... dern-dern-dern-da-doo ... dern-dern-dern-dern-da-doo-di-da-da ... dern-dern-dern-dern-dern-dern-dern-dern ... doo-di-da-da ...doo-doo-doo.

OK ... let's see what you've come up with.

Somerfrost says ... "Al Gore." Ummm ... no ... sorry ... Al Gore really wasn't elected president ... he was the loser ... that's not correct.

Downthestretch says ... "Kofi Annan." Gee ... sorry ... Kofi is just a corrupt, bumbling, tyrant-loving bureaucrat who'd actually be happy to see us murdered.

Pgardn says ... "Barney Frank." Nope ... also not correct ... Mr. Frank is an outstanding congressman and a very attractive man ... especially when he drools out of the right side of his mouth ... but no that's not correct either.

The correct answer is ... "George W. Bush" ... yes, George W. Bush has been the president of the United States for the past five years ... and has the overall responsibility for securing the safety and freedom of American citizens ... and has fulfilled that responsibility with great success ... George W. Bush is the correct answer.

There you go again! Bold B puts words that he "thought" he heard into others' mouths.... go back and find where I said "Kofi Anan" in this thread...

Thsi just reveals your skilled debating tactics...NOT!

[SentToStud]

Originally Posted by Bold Brooklynite

And here's the bottom line ...

All of the leftist arguments have been about process ... not about results. The fact is that all of us have been safe and secure at our keyboards for the past five years ... not because there aren't savages who would gladly murder us all ... but because our armed forces and police forces and intelligence agencies have been doing a terrific job of killing and capturing the terrorists ... and foiling their plots to attack us ... even right now as we view this post.

And who has been overall in charge of this amazingly successful security effort? Who is the one person who would be taking a barrage of hateful invective had there been additional attacks ... but who instead deserves the highest accolades in their absence?

I'll give you a few seconds to come up with the answer. Let's play the "Jeopardy" theme song while you tax your brains to come up with the answer ...

Dern-da-doo ... dern-dern-dern-da-doo ... dern-dern-dern-dern-da-doo-di-da-da ... dern-dern-dern-dern-dern-dern-dern-dern ... doo-di-da-da ...doo-doo-doo.

OK ... let's see what you've come up with.

Somerfrost says ... "Al Gore." Ummm ... no ... sorry ... Al Gore really wasn't elected president ... he was the loser ... that's not correct.

Downthestretch says ... "Kofi Annan." Gee ... sorry ... Kofi is just a corrupt, bumbling, tyrant-loving bureaucrat who'd actually be happy to see us murdered.

Pgardn says ... "Barney Frank." Nope ... also not correct ... Mr. Frank is an outstanding congressman and a very attractive man ... especially when he drools out of the right side of his mouth ... but no that's not correct either.

The correct answer is ... "George W. Bush" ... yes, George W. Bush has been the president of the United States for the past five years ... and has the overall responsibility for securing the safety and freedom of American citizens ... and has fulfilled that responsibility with great success ... George W. Bush is the correct answer.

Forget it a s s wipe. You are exposed. Liar, fraud, bigot, fool.

Here, again is your article.

http://townhall.com/columnists/MikeS...omatic_handgun

You have zero credibility. In fact it's doubtful you've done any reading at all. Most likely just repeating what you see on TV and hear on the radio.

You called me a liar.

there's the link.

You're not just a far-right bigoted zealot. You're uneducated.

Sorry. You're exposed and done.

Schmendrick.

[somerfrost]

Originally Posted by Bold Brooklynite

And here's the bottom line ...

All of the leftist arguments have been about process ... not about results. The fact is that all of us have been safe and secure at our keyboards for the past five years ... not because there aren't savages who would gladly murder us all ... but because our armed forces and police forces and intelligence agencies have been doing a terrific job of killing and capturing the terrorists ... and foiling their plots to attack us ... even right now as we view this post.

And who has been overall in charge of this amazingly successful security effort? Who is the one person who would be taking a barrage of hateful invective had there been additional attacks ... but who instead deserves the highest accolades in their absence?

I'll give you a few seconds to come up with the answer. Let's play the "Jeopardy" theme song while you tax your brains to come up with the answer ...

Dern-da-doo ... dern-dern-dern-da-doo ... dern-dern-dern-dern-da-doo-di-da-da ... dern-dern-dern-dern-dern-dern-dern-dern ... doo-di-da-da ...doo-doo-doo.

OK ... let's see what you've come up with.

Somerfrost says ... "Al Gore." Ummm ... no ... sorry ... Al Gore really wasn't elected president ... he was the loser ... that's not correct.

Downthestretch says ... "Kofi Annan." Gee ... sorry ... Kofi is just a corrupt, bumbling, tyrant-loving bureaucrat who'd actually be happy to see us murdered.

Pgardn says ... "Barney Frank." Nope ... also not correct ... Mr. Frank is an outstanding congressman and a very attractive man ... especially when he drools out of the right side of his mouth ... but no that's not correct either.

The correct answer is ... "George W. Bush" ... yes, George W. Bush has been the president of the United States for the past five years ... and has the overall responsibility for securing the safety and freedom of American citizens ... and has fulfilled that responsibility with great success ... George W. Bush is the correct answer.

Funny that you'd link me to Algore...I always agreed with Rush's view on that intellectual cripple. Actually, it's the brave, hard-working men and women of our much-berated intelligence community who deserve the credit! They had an almost impossible task of infiltrating terrorist cells throughout the world yet, as you say, here we are, years later, without another major event on US soil...a tribute to our best and brightest...but not to Bush, Clinton or any of the other figureheads of the rich and powerful who inhabit the White House.

[Downthestretch55]

Originally Posted by somerfrost

Truly a legend in your own mind...as I believe I said in response somewhere to a post by Scuds...arrogance isn't a bad thing until paired with stupidity! When you've been shown to be a narrow-minded fool and still think you've won the argument, you are beyond help...and a complete waste of time to respond to anymore. Concrete thinking, robotic echolalia...a true credit to the American right! You remind me of the joke about the ant floating downstream on it's back yelling, "raise the drawbridge boys, I got a hard-on!" Sorry to tell you guy, but like that ant, the logic and "evidence" behind your arguments simply doesn't come close!

Here is the classic post Bold B.
You might want to take the time to read it.
I'll probably repost it here another twenty five times in case you missed it.

Originally Posted by Downthestretch55

Here is the classic post Bold B.
You might want to take the time to read it.
I'll probably repost it here another twenty five times in case you missed it.

Hmmm ... but it's always you guys who resort to personal attacks, name-calling, and vulgarity.

Is that your way of demonstrating the intellectual content of your arguments?

[Downthestretch55]

Originally Posted by Bold Brooklynite

Hmmm ... but it's always you guys who resort to personal attacks, name-calling, and vulgarity.

Is that your way of demonstrating the intellectual content of your arguments?

Bold B,
If YOu dish it out, don't be the least bit surprised if you get it back...
and if you didn't get a chance to read the classic post...here it is again (no.2, 23 to go):

Truly a legend in your own mind...as I believe I said in response somewhere to a post by Scuds...arrogance isn't a bad thing until paired with stupidity! When you've been shown to be a narrow-minded fool and still think you've won the argument, you are beyond help...and a complete waste of time to respond to anymore. Concrete thinking, robotic echolalia...a true credit to the American right! You remind me of the joke about the ant floating downstream on it's back yelling, "raise the drawbridge boys, I got a hard-on!" Sorry to tell you guy, but like that ant, the logic and "evidence" behind your arguments simply doesn't come close!

Originally Posted by Downthestretch55

Bold B,
If YOu dish it out, don't be the least bit surprised if you get it back...
and if you didn't get a chance to read the classic post...here it is again (no.2, 23 to go):

Truly a legend in your own mind...as I believe I said in response somewhere to a post by Scuds...arrogance isn't a bad thing until paired with stupidity! When you've been shown to be a narrow-minded fool and still think you've won the argument, you are beyond help...and a complete waste of time to respond to anymore. Concrete thinking, robotic echolalia...a true credit to the American right! You remind me of the joke about the ant floating downstream on it's back yelling, "raise the drawbridge boys, I got a hard-on!" Sorry to tell you guy, but like that ant, the logic and "evidence" behind your arguments simply doesn't come close!

It's interesting that you consider a post which consists of name-calling, personal attacks, and sophomoric vulgarity to be a "classic."

Please ... please ... continue to use it as your signature. It reveals a great deal more about you than you're smart enough to realize.

Very revealing ... yes, indeed ... very revealing.

[SentToStud]

Originally Posted by Bold Brooklynite

Hmmm ... but it's always you guys who resort to personal attacks, name-calling, and vulgarity.

Is that your way of demonstrating the intellectual content of your arguments?

Well, 3 days now and you never answered any of my reasnable questions nor have you responded to my kindly worded PM.

That's ok, it's to be expected. Is it cowardly? You tell me. Just interesting you never can think long and hard enough to create and express a cogent thought of your own.

There's nothing wrong with being a far-right zealot. It's just the lack of courage to respond that is unseemly.

I enjoy talking to others who share views other than mine. You, on the other hand, probably go to the same places every day and lament about the world as it is with others of your similar deign.

If I want to hear what you have to say, I can buy a cheap bird and train it to say, "Sowell. Sowell. Sowell."

I have wasted too much time on you, though you are fortunate to have learned from me.

Reach one. Teach one.

Schmendrik, pachdn, narisch, fargleibter. Take your pick. They all are you.