Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Main Forum > The Paddock
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-15-2007, 11:32 AM
slotdirt's Avatar
slotdirt slotdirt is offline
Atlantic City Race Course
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 4,894
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by justindew
3) If I were to argue that Fusaichi Pegasus, Smarty Jones, and Point Given represented our best shots at a Triple Crown winner in the last 10 years, would I get laughed out of the room?
I'd say no on the latter two, yes on the former.
__________________
The world's foremost expert on virtually everything on the Redskins 2010 season: "Im going to go out on a limb here. I say they make the playoffs."
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-15-2007, 11:35 AM
cmorioles's Avatar
cmorioles cmorioles is offline
Santa Anita
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 3,169
Default

War Emblem was better than Pegasus. I'd even put Empire Maker, who I disliked a lot, ahead of FuPeg.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-15-2007, 11:39 AM
justindew's Avatar
justindew justindew is offline
Fairgrounds
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,640
Default

If Fusaichi Pegasus handles the swamp at Pimlico and finishes first instead of second, I think he trounces Commendable and the rest of the worst field ever assembled for a Belmont Stakes.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-15-2007, 11:46 AM
cmorioles's Avatar
cmorioles cmorioles is offline
Santa Anita
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 3,169
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by justindew
If Fusaichi Pegasus handles the swamp at Pimlico and finishes first instead of second, I think he trounces Commendable and the rest of the worst field ever assembled for a Belmont Stakes.
If he wins, I seriously doubt the Belmont field would have been so weak. I don't, however, agree it was the slop that did him in.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-15-2007, 11:50 AM
NTamm1215 NTamm1215 is offline
Havre de Grace
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 5,629
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cmorioles
War Emblem was better than Pegasus. I'd even put Empire Maker, who I disliked a lot, ahead of FuPeg.
Really? War Emblem?

Maybe he's just one of the horses I most disliked over the years. He always seemed like a beneficiary of circumstance, the big Beyer over one of the world's most speed-favoring tracks, then a Derby filled with average horses (save Medaglia d'Oro who was a no-show that day), then a performance in the Belmont that would have been bad even if he had been on all four legs coming out of the gate.

Count me among those who think FuPeg was WAY better than War Emblem.

NT
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-15-2007, 11:54 AM
cmorioles's Avatar
cmorioles cmorioles is offline
Santa Anita
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 3,169
Default

Well, he won two legs of the TC, FuPeg one. He also went on to take the Haskell, while FuPeg won the Jerome. War Emblem earned figures as good, actually better I think, then FuPeg.

As for the Belmont, the break is the most overlooked form of trouble in racing in my opinion. War Emblem had zero chance after that break.

I forgot one other horse that may have had the best chance to win the TC the last decade...Ghostzapper.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-15-2007, 12:00 PM
NTamm1215 NTamm1215 is offline
Havre de Grace
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 5,629
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cmorioles
Well, he won two legs of the TC, FuPeg one. He also went on to take the Haskell, while FuPeg won the Jerome. War Emblem earned figures as good, actually better I think, then FuPeg.

As for the Belmont, the break is the most overlooked form of trouble in racing in my opinion. War Emblem had zero chance after that break.

I forgot one other horse that may have had the best chance to win the TC the last decade...Ghostzapper.
I respect your opinion. While I think to a great extent FuPeg was a beneficiary of circumstance in the Derby, I still think he was the best in that race. Undoubtedly the best horse born in 1997 was Tiznow, but unfortunately he was not around to contest the TC.

I completely agree on Ghostzapper though. The 2003 3YO bunch would have had a run for their money.

NT
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-15-2007, 12:07 PM
blackthroatedwind blackthroatedwind is offline
Jerome Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 9,938
Default

The FuPeg argument is a little like my argument that Bellamy Road was the superior horse of that crop. I can't back it up with facts particularly, and the other side can do a better job of that, but it's just my opinion. FuPeg was overrated, no doubt, but he was also pretty good. He was basically done in by physical issues, perhaps partly because he was excessively babied, and I happen to agree with Justin that he didn't handle the track at Pimlico at all in the Preakness. I am loathe to use that as an excuse but in watching that race it seems painfully obvious to me.

War Emblem's faster numbers were somewhat circumstantial, though I guess his Preakness win was totally legitimate, so I suppose the argument is at least fair. But, even though FuPeg ultimately was a disappointment, drowning El Corredor and Albert the Great ( who won the Jockey Club by 10 a few weeks later - he forgot to bounce ) in the Jerome off a four month layoff was pretty damn impressive.

To me, Silver Charm and Touch Gold could both have won the Triple Crown against some of the crops we have seen in recent years. I think a sound Touch Gold was better than Smarty Jones.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-15-2007, 12:10 PM
philcski's Avatar
philcski philcski is offline
Goodwood
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Mission Viejo, CA
Posts: 8,872
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cmorioles
Well, he won two legs of the TC, FuPeg one. He also went on to take the Haskell, while FuPeg won the Jerome. War Emblem earned figures as good, actually better I think, then FuPeg.

As for the Belmont, the break is the most overlooked form of trouble in racing in my opinion. War Emblem had zero chance after that break.

I forgot one other horse that may have had the best chance to win the TC the last decade...Ghostzapper.
I know what you're saying as far as ability relative to the crop, but he wasn't ready for the rigors of the Triple Crown. Hell I don't even think Frankel knew what he had at that point.

I loved his quote after the Belmont- "Empire Maker is the best horse I've ever trained", and I'm thinking (after seeing Ghostzapper's return to the races in an electrifying performance) "he isn't even your best 3YO"
__________________
please use generalizations and non-truths when arguing your side, thank you
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-15-2007, 12:14 PM
cmorioles's Avatar
cmorioles cmorioles is offline
Santa Anita
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 3,169
Default

I do have a soft spot for War Emblem. I love horses that just go from the bell and dare you to get them.

I forgot about Silver Charm, he does make the decade cutoff. Touch Gold may have been better, but he was good for very short spurts of time and had way too many physical problems. I think even Free House could have won the TC in a few of the years this past decade. He was pretty darn good as well.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 05-15-2007, 12:18 PM
blackthroatedwind blackthroatedwind is offline
Jerome Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 9,938
Default

Captain Bodgit was no slouch either. That was an outstanding group. Hell, Pulpit was damn good as well.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-15-2007, 01:48 PM
the_fat_man's Avatar
the_fat_man the_fat_man is offline
Atlantic City Race Course
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 4,676
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cmorioles
Well, he won two legs of the TC, FuPeg one. He also went on to take the Haskell, while FuPeg won the Jerome. War Emblem earned figures as good, actually better I think, then FuPeg.

As for the Belmont, the break is the most overlooked form of trouble in racing in my opinion. War Emblem had zero chance after that break.

I forgot one other horse that may have had the best chance to win the TC the last decade...Ghostzapper.
If you'd seen WE in the paddock (assuming you weren't there) you'd have wanted no part of him. He looked terrible.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-15-2007, 01:59 PM
cmorioles's Avatar
cmorioles cmorioles is offline
Santa Anita
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 3,169
Default

I didn't want any part of him anyway. He was like 4 to 5 or something.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.